Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2024-10-17 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2024-10-17 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2024-10-17 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2024-10-17 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2019-04-01 → 2019-06-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2019-04-01 → 2019-06-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2019-04-01 → 2019-06-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2019-04-01 → 2019-06-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2019-04-01 → 2019-06-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2019-01-01 → 2019-03-31 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bromodichloromethane | 21.46 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 25.9 µg/L | 55/55 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 53.53 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 80.5 µg/L | 55/55 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 25.34 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 31 µg/L | 55/55 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Copper | 1210 µg/L 93% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 1640 µg/L | 48/50 | SYR4 | 2015–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 23.95 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 27.7 µg/L | 46/46 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| TTHM | 81.35 µg/L 102% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 108 µg/L | 46/46 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 59.3 µg/L 99% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 64.9 µg/L | 46/46 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 31.925 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 35.4 µg/L | 46/46 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 7.67 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 8.3 µg/L | 32/46 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromoform | 12.085 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 18.7 µg/L | 24/55 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 2.41 µg/L 16% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 7.97 µg/L | 17/50 | SYR4 | 2015–2019 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 5.44 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5.6 µg/L | 17/46 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Nitrate | 48.5 µg/L 0.5% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 16/16 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid | 1.58 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.9 µg/L | 9/46 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0010 mg/L 6.9% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 5/5 | LCR | 2027 |
| Fluoride | 658.9 µg/L 16% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 660 µg/L | 3/3 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Nitrate-Nitrite | 44.89 µg/L 0.4% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 45 µg/L | 3/3 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Barium | 4.185 µg/L 0.2% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 4.2 µg/L | 2/2 | SYR4 | 2015–2018 |
| Cyanide | 13 µg/L 6.5% of the EPA limit 200 µg/L | 1/3 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Carbon Tetrachloride | 0.7300 µg/L 15% of the EPA limit 5 µg/L | 1/9 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Xylenes, Total | 1.01 µg/L 0% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 1/9 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
87 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Alto Rural Wsc Central High Plant
Is Alto Rural Wsc Central High Plant tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 21 contaminants in Alto Rural Wsc Central High Plant's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Alto Rural Wsc Central High Plant's water?
EPA monitoring detected Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dibromochloromethane, Copper, Dichloroacetic Acid, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Alto Rural Wsc Central High Plant serve?
Alto Rural Wsc Central High Plant reports serving 1,305 people in Texas, per its EPA record.
Has Alto Rural Wsc Central High Plant had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 108 violations on file for Alto Rural Wsc Central High Plant, of which 21 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 3 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.