Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 1992-09-01 → 1992-09-30 |
| MON | Monitoring | Resolved | 2025-09-01 → 2025-09-30 |
| MON | Monitoring | Resolved | 2025-09-01 → 2025-09-30 |
| MON | Monitoring | Resolved | 2025-09-01 → 2025-09-30 |
| MON | Monitoring | Resolved | 2025-09-01 → 2025-09-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2025-04-01 → 2025-06-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2025-04-01 → 2025-06-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2025-04-01 → 2025-06-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2025-04-01 → 2025-06-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2024-07-01 → 2024-09-30 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bromodichloromethane | 26.76 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 30.6 µg/L | 17/17 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromoform | 3.504 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.52 µg/L | 17/17 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 31.22 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 38.9 µg/L | 17/17 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 21.86 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 22.5 µg/L | 17/17 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| TTHM | 81.58 µg/L 102% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 95.5 µg/L | 17/17 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 21.9 µg/L 37% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 25.1 µg/L | 17/17 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 9.425 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 9.8 µg/L | 16/17 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 6.26 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 7.1 µg/L | 15/17 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 6.03 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 6.1 µg/L | 15/17 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Copper | 426.6 µg/L 33% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 432 µg/L | 10/10 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Lead | 0.00063 mg/L 4.2% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 6/6 | LCR | 2023 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 6.795 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 7.5 µg/L | 4/17 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 0.6656 µg/L 4.4% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 0.6710 µg/L | 3/10 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
1 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Rusk Rural Wsc Iron Hill
Is Rusk Rural Wsc Iron Hill tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 13 contaminants in Rusk Rural Wsc Iron Hill's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Rusk Rural Wsc Iron Hill's water?
EPA monitoring detected Bromodichloromethane, Bromoform, Chloroform, Dibromochloromethane, TTHM, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Rusk Rural Wsc Iron Hill serve?
Rusk Rural Wsc Iron Hill reports serving 447 people in Texas, per its EPA record.
Has Rusk Rural Wsc Iron Hill had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 23 violations on file for Rusk Rural Wsc Iron Hill, of which 1 is health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.