← Texas

Tap water quality report

Green Hills Subdivision

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 77 contaminants and detected 16. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

77
contaminants tested
16
detected
55
people served
15
health-based violations
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Private
Counties served
Cass

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

15
health-based violations
2,100
violations on file
10
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
TT Health-based Resolved 2024-10-17
TT Health-based Resolved 2024-10-17
TT Health-based Resolved 2024-10-17
TT Health-based Resolved 2024-10-17
MCL Health-based Resolved 2012-09-01 → 2012-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2012-09-01 → 2012-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2012-09-01 → 2012-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2012-09-01 → 2012-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2012-09-01 → 2012-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2012-09-01 → 2012-09-30

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Nitrate
2150 µg/L 22%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
16/16 SYR4 2013–2018
Copper
1.71 µg/L 0.1%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 1.79 µg/L
6/7 SYR4 2013–2016
Lead
0.6615 µg/L 4.4%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 0.6900 µg/L
6/7 SYR4 2013–2016
Nitrate-Nitrite
1851.5 µg/L 19%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 2150 µg/L
4/4 SYR4 2013–2016
Nitrite
26.95 µg/L 2.7%
of the EPA limit 1000 µg/L
worst single sample: 28.5 µg/L
3/4 SYR4 2013–2016
Barium
65.03 µg/L 3.3%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 66 µg/L
2/2 SYR4 2013–2016
Chloroform
2.905 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.95 µg/L
2/8 SYR4 2013–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
2.63 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.7 µg/L
2/2 SYR4 2016–2019
Lead
0.0 mg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
2/2 LCR 2025
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
3.935 µg/L 6.6%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 4 µg/L
2/2 SYR4 2016–2019
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)
1 pCi/L 20%
of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
1/1 SYR4 2013
Fluoride
78 µg/L 2%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
1/2 SYR4 2013–2016
Monochloroacetic Acid
1.1 µg/L
No EPA limit set
1/2 SYR4 2016–2019
Selenium
2.79 µg/L 5.6%
of the EPA limit 50 µg/L
1/2 SYR4 2013–2016
TTHM
2.95 µg/L 3.7%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
1/3 SYR4 2013–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
1.6 µg/L
No EPA limit set
1/2 SYR4 2016–2019
61 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane2,4,5-TP2,4-DAntimony, TotalArsenicAsbestosAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalBromodichloromethaneBromoformChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChromiumDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDibromoacetic AcidDibromochloromethaneDinosebEthylene DibromideEndrinEthylbenzeneGross Beta Particle ActivityHexachlorobenzeneHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorMonobromoacetic AcidOxamylPentachlorophenolPicloramSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
STEWART, MARK, KENNETH
Email
animaskid@gmail.com

Frequently asked questions about Green Hills Subdivision

Is Green Hills Subdivision tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 16 contaminants in Green Hills Subdivision's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Green Hills Subdivision's water?

EPA monitoring detected Nitrate, Copper, Lead, Nitrate-Nitrite, Nitrite, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Green Hills Subdivision serve?

Green Hills Subdivision reports serving 55 people in Texas, per its EPA record.

Has Green Hills Subdivision had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 2100 violations on file for Green Hills Subdivision, of which 15 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 10 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.