Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2024-04-01 → 2024-06-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2024-04-01 → 2024-06-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2024-04-01 → 2024-06-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2024-04-01 → 2024-06-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2006-03-01 → 2006-03-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2006-03-01 → 2006-03-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2006-03-01 → 2006-03-31 |
| Other | Monitoring | Unaddressed | 2025-07-10 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2025-07-01 → 2025-09-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2025-07-01 → 2025-09-30 |
PFAS detected
| Contaminant | Max | Detection rate | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pfpea | 0.0032 µg/L | 1/24 | 2024 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nitrate | 132 µg/L 1.3% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 152 µg/L | 176/178 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 21.455 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 30.5 µg/L | 170/170 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 15.42 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 24.6 µg/L | 170/170 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 30.155 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 37 µg/L | 170/170 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromoform | 13.525 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 24.1 µg/L | 166/170 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| TTHM | 79.1 µg/L 99% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 94.5 µg/L | 101/103 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 6.7 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 8.5 µg/L | 100/101 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 21.795 µg/L 36% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 29.9 µg/L | 100/101 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 5.705 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 7.1 µg/L | 100/101 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 8.11 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 18.4 µg/L | 87/101 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Copper | 508.5 µg/L 39% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 760 µg/L | 70/76 | SYR4 | 2013–2017 |
| Nitrate-Nitrite | 119.8 µg/L 1.2% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 150 µg/L | 33/33 | SYR4 | 2012–2015 |
| Fluoride | 537.5 µg/L 13% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 707 µg/L | 30/30 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 6.62 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 10.6 µg/L | 29/101 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Barium | 44.3 µg/L 2.2% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 47 µg/L | 28/28 | SYR4 | 2015–2019 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid | 2.3 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.5 µg/L | 21/101 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Lead | 63.787 µg/L 425% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 1210 µg/L | 20/76 | SYR4 | 2013–2017 |
| Chromium | 3.61 µg/L 3.6% of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
worst single sample: 3.7 µg/L | 19/28 | SYR4 | 2015–2019 |
| Lithium | 14.2 µg/L No EPA limit set | 16/24 | UCMR-5 | 2024 |
| Lead | 0.0 mg/L 0% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 13/13 | LCR | 2024 |
| Xylenes, Total | 15.68 µg/L 0.2% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 35 µg/L | 13/69 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Selenium | 1.385 µg/L 2.8% of the EPA limit 50 µg/L
worst single sample: 1.4 µg/L | 4/28 | SYR4 | 2015–2019 |
| Combined Radium (-226 And -228) | 1.5 pCi/L 30% of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L | 3/3 | SYR4 | 2016 |
| Antimony, Total | 0.2700 µg/L 4.5% of the EPA limit 6 µg/L | 1/28 | SYR4 | 2015–2019 |
| Ethylbenzene | 2.85 µg/L 0.4% of the EPA limit 700 µg/L | 1/69 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
83 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Bi County Wsc 1
Is Bi County Wsc 1 tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 26 contaminants in Bi County Wsc 1's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Bi County Wsc 1's water?
EPA monitoring detected Nitrate, Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dibromochloromethane, Bromoform, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Bi County Wsc 1 serve?
Bi County Wsc 1 reports serving 12,777 people in Texas, per its EPA record.
Has Bi County Wsc 1 had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 98 violations on file for Bi County Wsc 1, of which 7 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 1 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.