Tap WaterIndex

← Texas

Tap water quality report

130 Regional Wsc

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 13 contaminants and detected 8. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

13
contaminants tested
8
detected
0
people served
4
health-based violations
Texas rankingsLead in TexasPFAS in Texas
Water source
GWP
Ownership
Private
Counties served
Burleson

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

4
health-based violations
16
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 2016-03-01 → 2016-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2016-03-01 → 2016-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2016-03-01 → 2016-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2016-03-01 → 2016-03-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2014-01-01 → 2014-03-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2014-01-01 → 2014-03-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2014-01-01 → 2014-03-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2014-01-01 → 2014-03-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2013-10-01 → 2013-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2013-10-01 → 2013-12-31

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the single worst sample on record — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Bromodichloromethane
4.4 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 6/6 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromoform
5.7 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 6/6 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
7.6 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 6/6 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
3.1 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 4/6 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
18.8 µg/L 24%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
 3/4 SYR4 2012–2018
Copper
2.1 µg/L 0.2%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
 2/2 SYR4 2013–2016
Dibromoacetic Acid
1.2 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 2/3 SYR4 2012–2018
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
1.2 µg/L 2%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
 2/3 SYR4 2012–2018
5 contaminants tested, none detected
Dichloroacetic AcidLeadMonobromoacetic AcidMonochloroacetic AcidTrichloroacetic Acid

Utility contact

Contact
SAMFORD, DUSTIN
Email
DSamford@epcor.com

Frequently asked questions about 130 Regional Wsc

Is 130 Regional Wsc tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 8 contaminants in 130 Regional Wsc's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in 130 Regional Wsc's water?

EPA monitoring detected Bromodichloromethane, Bromoform, Dibromochloromethane, Chloroform, TTHM, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does 130 Regional Wsc serve?

130 Regional Wsc reports serving 0 people in Texas, per its EPA record.

Has 130 Regional Wsc had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 16 violations on file for 130 Regional Wsc, of which 4 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.