← Texas

Tap water quality report

Wickson Creek Sud

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 109 contaminants and detected 24. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

109
contaminants tested
24
detected
15,000
people served
4
health-based violations
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Brazos

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

4
health-based violations
20
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Archived 1984-12-20 → 1985-12-19
MCL Health-based Archived 1982-09-01 → 1985-08-31
MCL Health-based Archived 1981-05-11 → 1982-05-10
MCL Health-based Archived 1981-05-01 → 1982-04-30
Other Monitoring Resolved 2025-08-11
Other Monitoring Resolved 2025-08-11
MR Monitoring Resolved 2024-01-01 → 2024-06-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2024-01-01 → 2024-06-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2024-01-01 → 2024-06-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2024-01-01 → 2024-06-30

PFAS detected

PFAS are industrial “forever chemicals”. These are the EPA's latest nationwide test results (2023–2025).
ContaminantMaxDetection ratePeriod
6:2 Fts 0.0127 µg/L 1/6 2023
PFBS 0.0036 µg/L 1/6 2023

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Copper
331.6 µg/L 26%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 525 µg/L
122/123 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
21.13 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 47.1 µg/L
75/75 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromodichloromethane
12.31 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 17.7 µg/L
74/75 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
11.97 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 23.9 µg/L
64/75 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromoform
30.55 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 54.3 µg/L
63/75 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
2.091 µg/L 14%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 4.44 µg/L
63/123 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
63.1 µg/L 79%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 119 µg/L
61/61 SYR4 2013–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
12.5 µg/L 21%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 20.4 µg/L
61/61 SYR4 2013–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
7.3 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 9.6 µg/L
57/61 SYR4 2013–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
5.5 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 10.6 µg/L
51/61 SYR4 2013–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
4.64 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 9.8 µg/L
37/61 SYR4 2013–2019
Nitrate
218.5 µg/L 2.2%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 290 µg/L
32/34 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.00082 mg/L 5.5%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
15/15 LCR 2024
Barium
72.675 µg/L 3.6%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 83.5 µg/L
6/6 SYR4 2012–2019
Fluoride
1435 µg/L 36%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 1560 µg/L
6/6 SYR4 2012–2019
Nitrate-Nitrite
145 µg/L 1.5%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 160 µg/L
5/5 SYR4 2012–2019
Xylenes, Total
1.11 µg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 1.2 µg/L
4/14 SYR4 2012–2019
Lithium
35.4 µg/L
No EPA limit set
4/6 UCMR-5 2023
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)
1.5 pCi/L 30%
of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
2/2 SYR4 2015–2016
Chromium
0.4270 µg/L 0.4%
of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
1/6 SYR4 2012–2019
Gross Beta Particle Activity
5 pCi/L
No EPA limit set
1/3 SYR4 2015–2019
Monobromoacetic Acid
2 µg/L
No EPA limit set
1/61 SYR4 2013–2019
85 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS2,4,5-TP2,4-D4:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalArsenicAsbestosAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneCombined UraniumDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDinosebEthylene DibromideEndrinEthylbenzeneGross Alpha, Excl. Radon And UHexachlorobenzeneHfpo-DaHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorMonochloroacetic AcidNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaNitriteOxamylPfbaPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfhxaPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPFOSPfpeaPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl Chloridecis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
DUNN, JAMES
Phone
979-589-3030

Frequently asked questions about Wickson Creek Sud

Is Wickson Creek Sud tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 24 contaminants in Wickson Creek Sud's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Wickson Creek Sud's water?

EPA monitoring detected Copper, Dibromochloromethane, Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Bromoform, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Wickson Creek Sud serve?

Wickson Creek Sud reports serving 15,000 people in Texas, per its EPA record.

Has Wickson Creek Sud had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 20 violations on file for Wickson Creek Sud, of which 4 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.