← Texas

Tap water quality report

City of Freeport

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 50 contaminants and detected 22. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

50
contaminants tested
22
detected
10,594
people served
7
health-based violations
Water source
SWP
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Brazoria

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

7
health-based violations
22
violations on file
2
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Archived 1986-09-26 → 1986-12-25
MCL Health-based Archived 1986-06-25 → 1986-09-24
MCL Health-based Archived 1986-03-20 → 1986-06-19
MCL Health-based Archived 1985-12-17 → 1986-03-16
MCL Health-based Archived 1985-10-04 → 1986-01-03
MCL Health-based Archived 1985-03-21 → 1985-06-20
MCL Health-based Archived 1984-12-31 → 1985-03-30
Other Monitoring Unaddressed 2025-07-01
MR Monitoring Resolved 2024-10-01 → 2024-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2024-10-01 → 2024-12-31

PFAS detected

PFAS are industrial “forever chemicals”. These are the EPA's latest nationwide test results (2023–2025).
ContaminantMaxDetection ratePeriod
Pfba 0.0127 µg/L 4/4 2024
Pfhxa 0.0054 µg/L 4/4 2024
Pfpea 0.1510 µg/L 4/4 2024
PFBS 0.0032 µg/L 1/4 2024

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Bromodichloromethane
10.74 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 40.6 µg/L
107/107 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
12.57 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 26.5 µg/L
107/107 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
36.09 µg/L 45%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 137 µg/L
107/107 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
28.75 µg/L 48%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 48.5 µg/L
107/107 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
19.4 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 23.1 µg/L
106/107 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
8.71 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 17.3 µg/L
99/107 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
13.1 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 50.9 µg/L
97/107 SYR4 2012–2019
Copper
182.4 µg/L 14%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 250 µg/L
85/87 SYR4 2013–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
3.56 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 10.4 µg/L
85/107 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromoform
13.68 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 30.2 µg/L
80/107 SYR4 2012–2019
Nitrate
1627 µg/L 16%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 1770 µg/L
32/32 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0 mg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
17/17 LCR 2024
Monochloroacetic Acid
8 µg/L
No EPA limit set
14/107 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
5.584 µg/L 37%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 6.7 µg/L
10/87 SYR4 2013–2019
Nitrate-Nitrite
1658.5 µg/L 17%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 1780 µg/L
10/10 SYR4 2012–2019
Monobromoacetic Acid
1.24 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.3 µg/L
7/107 SYR4 2012–2019
Nitrite
285.5 µg/L 29%
of the EPA limit 1000 µg/L
worst single sample: 300 µg/L
2/10 SYR4 2012–2019
Lithium
17.6 µg/L
No EPA limit set
1/4 UCMR-5 2023
28 contaminants tested, none detected
11Cl-PF3OUdS4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAsbestosDalaponHfpo-DaNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPFOSPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaVinyl Chloride

Utility contact

Contact
CAIN, JERRY
Phone
979-233-3526
Email
jcain@freeporttx.gov

Frequently asked questions about City of Freeport

Is City of Freeport tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 22 contaminants in City of Freeport's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in City of Freeport's water?

EPA monitoring detected Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Dichloroacetic Acid, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does City of Freeport serve?

City of Freeport reports serving 10,594 people in Texas, per its EPA record.

Has City of Freeport had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 22 violations on file for City of Freeport, of which 7 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 2 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.