Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| RPT | Monitoring | Resolved | 2025-07-02 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2020-12-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2020-12-30 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2019-03-10 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2019-03-10 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2019-03-10 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2019-03-10 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2019-03-10 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2019-03-10 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2019-03-10 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Copper | 804 µg/L 62% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L | 169/191 | SYR4 | 2013–2017 |
| Bromoform | 26.4 µg/L No EPA limit set | 130/145 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 15 µg/L No EPA limit set | 126/145 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| TTHM | 36.5 µg/L 46% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L | 109/110 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 10.4 µg/L 17% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L | 79/110 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 6.2 µg/L No EPA limit set | 75/110 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 9.5 µg/L No EPA limit set | 65/145 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 29 µg/L 193% of the EPA limit, in the worst sample — 15 µg/L | 41/191 | SYR4 | 2013–2017 |
| Nitrate | 30 µg/L 0.3% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 26/82 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0013 mg/L 8.7% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 16/16 | LCR | 2023 |
| Lithium | 105.7 µg/L No EPA limit set | 12/12 | UCMR-5 | 2025 |
| Barium | 237 µg/L 12% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L | 11/11 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Fluoride | 490 µg/L 12% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L | 11/11 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Combined Radium (-226 And -228) | 3.9 pCi/L 78% of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L | 9/9 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Gross Beta Particle Activity | 12.7 pCi/L No EPA limit set | 9/9 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U | 7.2 pCi/L 48% of the EPA limit 15 pCi/L | 7/9 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 9.3 µg/L No EPA limit set | 7/110 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 7.1 µg/L No EPA limit set | 6/145 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Nitrate-Nitrite | 30 µg/L 0.3% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 5/19 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Xylenes, Total | 14 µg/L 0.1% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 5/35 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Ethylbenzene | 1.7 µg/L 0.2% of the EPA limit 700 µg/L | 3/35 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Selenium | 7 µg/L 14% of the EPA limit 50 µg/L | 3/11 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Arsenic | 2.1 µg/L 21% of the EPA limit 10 µg/L | 1/11 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 2.3 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/110 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
85 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about City of Pleasanton
Is City of Pleasanton tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 24 contaminants in City of Pleasanton's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in City of Pleasanton's water?
EPA monitoring detected Copper, Bromoform, Dibromochloromethane, TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does City of Pleasanton serve?
City of Pleasanton reports serving 17,985 people in Texas, per its EPA record.
Has City of Pleasanton had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 53 violations on file for City of Pleasanton, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.