Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| TT | Health-based | Unaddressed | 2024-10-17 |
| TT | Health-based | Unaddressed | 2024-10-17 |
| TT | Health-based | Unaddressed | 2024-10-17 |
| TT | Health-based | Unaddressed | 2024-10-17 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2018-07-01 → 2018-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2018-07-01 → 2018-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2018-07-01 → 2018-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2018-07-01 → 2018-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2018-04-01 → 2018-06-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2018-04-01 → 2018-06-30 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chloroform | 210.3 µg/L No EPA limit set | 33/38 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 216.6 µg/L No EPA limit set | 31/38 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 151.3 µg/L No EPA limit set | 30/38 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromoform | 17.4 µg/L No EPA limit set | 28/38 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| TTHM | 345.8 µg/L 432% of the EPA limit, in the worst sample — 80 µg/L | 28/32 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 123 µg/L 205% of the EPA limit, in the worst sample — 60 µg/L | 28/32 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 53.1 µg/L No EPA limit set | 27/32 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 53.5 µg/L No EPA limit set | 26/32 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 30.5 µg/L No EPA limit set | 25/32 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 13.6 µg/L No EPA limit set | 15/32 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid | 3.1 µg/L No EPA limit set | 14/32 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Nitrate | 385 µg/L 3.9% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 10/16 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Copper | 5.2 µg/L 0.4% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L | 7/12 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Lead | 0.0037 mg/L 25% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 6/6 | LCR | 2000 |
| Lead | 2 µg/L 13% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L | 5/12 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Fluoride | 1010 µg/L 25% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L | 3/3 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Nitrate-Nitrite | 385 µg/L 3.9% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 3/3 | SYR4 | 2012–2015 |
| Barium | 54.6 µg/L 2.7% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L | 2/2 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Cyanide | 41.3 µg/L 21% of the EPA limit 200 µg/L | 1/2 | SYR4 | 2014–2018 |
| Chromium | 6.8 µg/L 6.8% of the EPA limit 100 µg/L | 1/2 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
55 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Pleasure Point
Is Pleasure Point tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 20 contaminants in Pleasure Point's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Pleasure Point's water?
EPA monitoring detected Chloroform, Bromodichloromethane, Dibromochloromethane, Bromoform, TTHM, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Pleasure Point serve?
Pleasure Point reports serving 110 people in Texas, per its EPA record.
Has Pleasure Point had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 1354 violations on file for Pleasure Point, of which 197 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 44 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.