← Tennessee

Tap water quality report

New Market Utility District

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 33 contaminants and detected 5. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

33
contaminants tested
5
detected
5,703
people served
2
health-based violations
Water source
SWP
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Jefferson

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

2
health-based violations
45
violations on file
2
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Archived 2000-06-01 → 2000-06-30
MCL Health-based Archived 2000-06-01 → 2000-06-30
Other Monitoring Unaddressed 2025-07-01
Other Monitoring Unaddressed 2024-07-01
Other Monitoring Resolved 2023-07-01
Other Monitoring Resolved 2023-07-01
MR Monitoring Resolved 2023-01-01
MR Monitoring Resolved 2023-01-01
Other Monitoring Resolved 2021-07-01
Other Monitoring Resolved 2021-07-01

PFAS detected

PFAS are industrial “forever chemicals”. These are the EPA's latest nationwide test results (2023–2025).
ContaminantMaxDetection ratePeriod
PFBS 0.0037 µg/L 3/4 2024
Pfpea 0.0042 µg/L 3/4 2024

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the single worst sample on record — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
22 µg/L 37%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
16/16 SYR4 2014–2019
TTHM
19 µg/L 24%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
15/16 SYR4 2014–2019
Lead
0.0070 mg/L 47%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
12/12 LCR 2025
28 contaminants tested, none detected
11Cl-PF3OUdS4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaHfpo-DaNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaPfbaPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfhxaPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPFOSPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaLithium

Utility contact

Contact
LARRANCE, JOHN A.
Phone
865-475-2467
Email
JLARRANCE76@gmail.com

Frequently asked questions about New Market Utility District

Is New Market Utility District tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 5 contaminants in New Market Utility District's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in New Market Utility District's water?

EPA monitoring detected Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), TTHM, Lead, PFBS, Pfpea. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does New Market Utility District serve?

New Market Utility District reports serving 5,703 people in Tennessee, per its EPA record.

Has New Market Utility District had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 45 violations on file for New Market Utility District, of which 2 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 2 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.