Tap water quality report

First U.D. of Hawkins County

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 59 contaminants and detected 5. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

59
contaminants tested
5
detected
19,972
people served
14
health-based violations
Water source
Surface water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Hawkins

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

14
health-based violations
61
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 2014-10-01 → 2014-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2014-10-01 → 2014-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2014-10-01 → 2014-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2014-10-01 → 2014-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2014-07-01 → 2014-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2014-07-01 → 2014-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2014-07-01 → 2014-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2014-07-01 → 2014-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2014-07-01 → 2014-09-30
TT Health-based Resolved 2011-10-01

PFAS detected

PFAS are industrial “forever chemicals”. These are the EPA's latest nationwide test results (2023–2025).
ContaminantMaxDetection ratePeriod
Pfba 0.0085 µg/L 3/4 2025

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the single worst sample on record — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
TTHM
139 µg/L 174%
of the EPA limit, in the worst sample — 80 µg/L
91/96 SYR4 2014–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
101 µg/L 168%
of the EPA limit, in the worst sample — 60 µg/L
90/96 SYR4 2014–2019
Nitrate
2530 µg/L 25%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
74/74 SYR4 2014–2019
Lead
0.0010 mg/L 6.7%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
14/14 LCR 2025
54 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS2,4-D4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAtrazineBenzeneChlorobenzeneCarbon TetrachlorideDichloromethaneEthylbenzeneGross Alpha, Excl. Radon And UHfpo-DaNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaPFBSPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfhxaPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPFOSPfpeaPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaPicloramStyreneTetrachloroethyleneTolueneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneLithiumO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Frequently asked questions about First U.D. of Hawkins County

Is First U.D. of Hawkins County tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 5 contaminants in First U.D. of Hawkins County's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in First U.D. of Hawkins County's water?

EPA monitoring detected TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Nitrate, Lead, Pfba. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does First U.D. of Hawkins County serve?

First U.D. of Hawkins County reports serving 19,972 people, per its EPA record.

Has First U.D. of Hawkins County had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 61 violations on file for First U.D. of Hawkins County, of which 14 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.