← South Dakota

Tap water quality report

Spring Creek Sanitary District

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 5 contaminants and detected 5. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

5
contaminants tested
5
detected
465
people served
12
health-based violations
Water source
SWP
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Hughes

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

12
health-based violations
49
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
TT Health-based Resolved 1995-01-01 → 1995-12-31
TT Health-based Resolved 1995-01-01 → 1995-12-31
TT Health-based Resolved 1995-01-01 → 1995-12-31
TT Health-based Resolved 1995-01-01 → 1995-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 1994-02-01 → 1994-02-28
MCL Health-based Resolved 1994-02-01 → 1994-02-28
MCL Health-based Resolved 1994-02-01 → 1994-02-28
MCL Health-based Resolved 1993-06-01 → 1993-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 1993-06-01 → 1993-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 1993-06-01 → 1993-06-30

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the single worst sample on record — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Copper
530 µg/L 41%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
15/15 SYR4 2013–2019
Lead
2.1 µg/L 14%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
15/15 SYR4 2013–2019
Lead
0.0010 mg/L 6.7%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
12/12 LCR 2025
TTHM
69.8 µg/L 87%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
7/7 SYR4 2013–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
47.9 µg/L 80%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
7/7 SYR4 2013–2019

Utility contact

Contact
FORREST ZUBER
Email
forrest.sccc@gmail.com

Frequently asked questions about Spring Creek Sanitary District

Is Spring Creek Sanitary District tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 5 contaminants in Spring Creek Sanitary District's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Spring Creek Sanitary District's water?

EPA monitoring detected Copper, Lead, Lead, TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5). The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Spring Creek Sanitary District serve?

Spring Creek Sanitary District reports serving 465 people in South Dakota, per its EPA record.

Has Spring Creek Sanitary District had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 49 violations on file for Spring Creek Sanitary District, of which 12 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.