Tap WaterIndex

← South Dakota

Tap water quality report

Fordham Colony

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 19 contaminants and detected 3. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

19
contaminants tested
3
detected
142
people served
61
health-based violations
South Dakota rankingsLead in South DakotaPFAS in South Dakota
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Private
Counties served
Clark

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

61
health-based violations
178
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 2009-09-01 → 2009-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2009-09-01 → 2009-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2009-09-01 → 2009-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2007-12-01 → 2007-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2007-12-01 → 2007-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2007-12-01 → 2007-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2007-11-01 → 2007-11-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2007-11-01 → 2007-11-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2007-11-01 → 2007-11-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2007-11-01 → 2007-11-30

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the single worst sample on record — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Copper
30 µg/L 2.3%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
 15/15 SYR4 2013–2019
Lead
0.1800 µg/L 1.2%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
 15/15 SYR4 2013–2019
Lead
0.0 mg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
 13/13 LCR 2025
16 contaminants tested, none detected
Antimony, TotalArsenicBariumBeryllium, TotalCadmiumChromiumCombined Radium (-226 And -228)Combined UraniumFluorideGross Alpha, Excl. Radon And UGross Beta Particle ActivityMercuryNitrateNitriteSeleniumThallium, Total

Utility contact

Contact
DAVID GLANZER
Phone
6052330353
Email
dglanzer@hotmail.com

Frequently asked questions about Fordham Colony

Is Fordham Colony tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 3 contaminants in Fordham Colony's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Fordham Colony's water?

EPA monitoring detected Copper, Lead, Lead. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Fordham Colony serve?

Fordham Colony reports serving 142 people in South Dakota, per its EPA record.

Has Fordham Colony had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 178 violations on file for Fordham Colony, of which 61 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.