Tap WaterIndex

← South Dakota

Tap water quality report

Ward

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 1 contaminant and detected 1. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

1
contaminants tested
1
detected
41
people served
2
health-based violations
South Dakota rankingsLead in South DakotaPFAS in South Dakota
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Moody

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

2
health-based violations
211
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Archived 1994-09-01 → 1994-09-30
MCL Health-based Archived 1994-09-01 → 1994-09-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2023-10-01 → 2023-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2023-10-01 → 2023-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2023-01-01 → 2023-03-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2023-01-01 → 2023-03-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2023-01-01 → 2023-03-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2023-01-01 → 2023-03-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2023-01-01 → 2023-03-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2023-01-01 → 2023-03-31

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the single worst sample on record — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Lead
0.0030 mg/L 20%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
 7/7 LCR 2025

Utility contact

Contact
TOM KAMPMANN
Phone
6056907727
Email
feathersnest@gmail.com

Frequently asked questions about Ward

Is Ward tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 1 contaminant in Ward's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Ward's water?

EPA monitoring detected Lead. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Ward serve?

Ward reports serving 41 people in South Dakota, per its EPA record.

Has Ward had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 211 violations on file for Ward, of which 2 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.