Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2012-10-01 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2012-10-01 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2012-10-01 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2009-07-01 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2009-07-01 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2009-07-01 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Copper | 290 µg/L 22% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L | 19/20 | SYR4 | 2015–2018 |
| Lead | 0.00023 mg/L 1.5% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 9/9 | LCR | 2024 |
| Lead | 0.4170 µg/L 2.8% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 0.5100 µg/L | 7/20 | SYR4 | 2015–2018 |
| Chloroform | 3.4175 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.82 µg/L | 6/7 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| TTHM | 8.715 µg/L 11% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 8.9 µg/L | 6/7 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 3.618 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.84 µg/L | 5/7 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 6.128 µg/L 10% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 6.7 µg/L | 5/7 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 2.22 µg/L No EPA limit set | 4/7 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 2.724 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.74 µg/L | 3/7 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Bromoform | 2.273 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.28 µg/L | 2/7 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 1.43 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/7 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid | 1.21 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/7 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 1.33 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/7 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
1 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Oswego Rural Water Co (sc4320006)
Is Oswego Rural Water Co (sc4320006) tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 13 contaminants in Oswego Rural Water Co (sc4320006)'s water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Oswego Rural Water Co (sc4320006)'s water?
EPA monitoring detected Copper, Lead, Lead, Chloroform, TTHM, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Oswego Rural Water Co (sc4320006) serve?
Oswego Rural Water Co (sc4320006) reports serving 3,282 people in South Carolina, per its EPA record.
Has Oswego Rural Water Co (sc4320006) had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 6 violations on file for Oswego Rural Water Co (sc4320006), of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.