Tap WaterIndex

← South Carolina

Tap water quality report

Woodruff Roebuck W/D (sc4220007)

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 107 contaminants and detected 22. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

107
contaminants tested
22
detected
32,038
people served
32
health-based violations
South Carolina rankingsLead in South CarolinaPFAS in South Carolina
Water source
Surface water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Spartanburg

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

32
health-based violations
35
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 2019-01-01 → 2019-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2019-01-01 → 2019-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2019-01-01 → 2019-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2019-01-01 → 2019-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2019-01-01 → 2019-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2019-01-01 → 2019-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2019-01-01 → 2019-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2019-01-01 → 2019-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2018-10-01 → 2018-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2018-10-01 → 2018-12-31

PFAS detected

PFAS are industrial “forever chemicals”. These are the EPA's latest nationwide test results (2023–2025).
ContaminantMaxDetection ratePeriod
Pfhxa 0.0043 µg/L 3/3 2025
Pfpea 0.0058 µg/L 3/3 2025
PFBS 0.0035 µg/L 1/3 2025
PFOA 0.0047 µg/L 1/3 2025

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the single worst sample on record — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Copper
229 µg/L 18%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
 148/149 SYR4 2014–2018
Bromodichloromethane
36.8 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 128/128 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
150.6 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 128/128 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
59.7 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 128/128 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
165.1 µg/L 206%
of the EPA limit, in the worst sample — 80 µg/L
 128/128 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
119 µg/L 198%
of the EPA limit, in the worst sample — 60 µg/L
 128/128 SYR4 2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
58.7 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 128/128 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
28.9 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 114/128 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
6.5 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 53/128 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0 mg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
 20/20 LCR 2024
Bromoform
5.4 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 17/128 SYR4 2012–2019
Monobromoacetic Acid
3.64 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 15/128 SYR4 2012–2019
Nitrate
810 µg/L 8.1%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
 14/14 SYR4 2013–2019
Fluoride
720 µg/L 18%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
 7/7 SYR4 2013–2019
Lead
24 µg/L 160%
of the EPA limit, in the worst sample — 15 µg/L
 5/149 SYR4 2014–2018
Monochloroacetic Acid
4.1 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 3/128 SYR4 2012–2019
Nitrate-Nitrite
460 µg/L 4.6%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
 2/2 SYR4 2013–2014
Xylenes, Total
1.24 µg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
 2/11 SYR4 2013–2019
85 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS2,4,5-TP2,4-D4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalArsenicAtrazineBhc-GammaBariumBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChromiumCombined Radium (-226 And -228)DichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDinosebDiquatEthylene DibromideEndrinEthylbenzeneGlyphosateGross Alpha, Excl. Radon And UHexachlorobenzeneHfpo-DaHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaNitriteOxamylPfbaPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOSPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl Chloridecis-1,2-DichloroethyleneLithiumO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
JOHNSON, KERMIT
Phone
864-476-3188
Email
kjohnson@wrwd.org; kthackston@wrwd.org; jerwin@wrwd.org; ASCHANEN@WRWD.ORG

Frequently asked questions about Woodruff Roebuck W/D (sc4220007)

Is Woodruff Roebuck W/D (sc4220007) tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 22 contaminants in Woodruff Roebuck W/D (sc4220007)'s water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Woodruff Roebuck W/D (sc4220007)'s water?

EPA monitoring detected Copper, Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dichloroacetic Acid, TTHM, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Woodruff Roebuck W/D (sc4220007) serve?

Woodruff Roebuck W/D (sc4220007) reports serving 32,038 people in South Carolina, per its EPA record.

Has Woodruff Roebuck W/D (sc4220007) had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 35 violations on file for Woodruff Roebuck W/D (sc4220007), of which 32 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.