Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2011-10-01 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2011-10-01 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2009-07-01 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2009-07-01 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2009-07-01 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 1992-07-01 → 1993-11-23 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 1992-07-01 → 1993-11-23 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 1992-07-01 → 1993-11-23 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 1992-07-01 → 1993-11-23 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 1992-07-01 → 1993-11-23 |
PFAS detected
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bromodichloromethane | 22.04 µg/L No EPA limit set | 116/116 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 29.0549 µg/L No EPA limit set | 116/116 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| TTHM | 55.78 µg/L 70% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L | 116/116 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 64.3 µg/L 107% of the EPA limit, in the worst sample — 60 µg/L | 114/116 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 13.02 µg/L No EPA limit set | 114/116 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid | 10.9 µg/L No EPA limit set | 113/116 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 44.7 µg/L No EPA limit set | 112/116 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 20.18 µg/L No EPA limit set | 109/116 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Copper | 646 µg/L 50% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L | 58/63 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 7.59 µg/L No EPA limit set | 57/116 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 11 µg/L 73% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L | 36/63 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Lead | 0.1350 mg/L 900% above the EPA limit of 0.0150 mg/L | 16/16 | LCR | 2023 |
| Bromoform | 10.05 µg/L No EPA limit set | 9/116 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 6.32 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/116 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
25 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Goose Creek City of (sc0810004)
Is Goose Creek City of (sc0810004) tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 19 contaminants in Goose Creek City of (sc0810004)'s water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Goose Creek City of (sc0810004)'s water?
EPA monitoring detected Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Trichloroacetic Acid, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Goose Creek City of (sc0810004) serve?
Goose Creek City of (sc0810004) reports serving 43,744 people in South Carolina, per its EPA record.
Has Goose Creek City of (sc0810004) had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 16 violations on file for Goose Creek City of (sc0810004), of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.