Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| TT | Health-based | Unaddressed | 2024-10-17 |
| TT | Health-based | Unaddressed | 2024-10-17 |
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 2014-12-01 → 2014-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 2012-11-01 → 2012-11-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 2009-11-01 → 2009-11-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 2006-04-01 → 2006-04-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 2005-08-01 → 2005-08-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 2001-07-01 → 2001-07-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 2000-09-01 → 2000-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Archived | 1999-03-01 → 1999-03-31 |
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Acued. Rural Jacanas Piedras Blancas I
Is Acued. Rural Jacanas Piedras Blancas I tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring found no contaminants above the detection limit for Acued. Rural Jacanas Piedras Blancas I. See the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for the full official status.
How many people does Acued. Rural Jacanas Piedras Blancas I serve?
Acued. Rural Jacanas Piedras Blancas I reports serving 649 people in PR, per its EPA record.
Has Acued. Rural Jacanas Piedras Blancas I had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 187 violations on file for Acued. Rural Jacanas Piedras Blancas I, of which 65 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 4 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.