Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| TT | Health-based | Unaddressed | 2024-10-17 |
| TT | Health-based | Unaddressed | 2024-10-17 |
| TT | Health-based | Addressed | 2008-01-01 |
| TT | Health-based | Addressed | 2008-01-01 |
| MON | Monitoring | Archived | 2026-03-01 → 2026-03-31 |
| MON | Monitoring | Archived | 2026-02-01 → 2026-02-28 |
| MON | Monitoring | Archived | 2026-01-01 → 2026-01-31 |
| MON | Monitoring | Archived | 2025-12-01 → 2025-12-31 |
| MON | Monitoring | Archived | 2025-12-01 → 2025-12-31 |
| MON | Monitoring | Archived | 2025-11-01 → 2025-11-30 |
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Acued. Com. Bo. Sierra Alta Sect. Cacao
Is Acued. Com. Bo. Sierra Alta Sect. Cacao tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring found no contaminants above the detection limit for Acued. Com. Bo. Sierra Alta Sect. Cacao. See the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for the full official status.
How many people does Acued. Com. Bo. Sierra Alta Sect. Cacao serve?
Acued. Com. Bo. Sierra Alta Sect. Cacao reports serving 55 people in PR, per its EPA record.
Has Acued. Com. Bo. Sierra Alta Sect. Cacao had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 196 violations on file for Acued. Com. Bo. Sierra Alta Sect. Cacao, of which 4 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 6 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.