Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2012-04-01 → 2012-04-30 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2012-04-01 → 2012-04-30 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2012-04-01 → 2012-04-30 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2012-04-01 → 2012-04-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2010-01-01 → 2010-03-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2010-01-01 → 2010-03-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2010-01-01 → 2010-03-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2010-01-01 → 2010-03-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2009-10-01 → 2009-12-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2009-10-01 → 2009-12-31 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Copper | 325 µg/L 25% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 420 µg/L | 51/64 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0 mg/L 0% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 13/13 | LCR | 2025 |
| Arsenic | 5.78 µg/L 58% of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
worst single sample: 6 µg/L | 12/12 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Barium | 744.85 µg/L 37% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 774 µg/L | 12/12 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Chromium | 4 µg/L 4% of the EPA limit 100 µg/L | 12/12 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| TTHM | 39.32 µg/L 49% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 41.3 µg/L | 12/12 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 9.3 µg/L 16% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 11.3 µg/L | 11/11 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Fluoride | 356 µg/L 8.9% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 410 µg/L | 10/12 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Lithium | 702 µg/L No EPA limit set | 8/8 | UCMR-5 | 2023 |
| Chloroform | 2 µg/L No EPA limit set | 7/9 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 5.975 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 6 µg/L | 6/6 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Bromoform | 23.525 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 28.3 µg/L | 6/6 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 10.95 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 11 µg/L | 6/6 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Lead | 8.65 µg/L 58% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 8.9 µg/L | 6/64 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Selenium | 9.5 µg/L 19% of the EPA limit 50 µg/L
worst single sample: 11 µg/L | 6/12 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 5.24 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5.4 µg/L | 3/3 | SYR4 | 2017–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 1.485 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.5 µg/L | 2/3 | SYR4 | 2017–2019 |
| Toluene | 6.01 µg/L 0.6% of the EPA limit 1000 µg/L
worst single sample: 6.3 µg/L | 2/14 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Antimony, Total | 0.4300 µg/L 7.2% of the EPA limit 6 µg/L | 1/12 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Combined Uranium | 3.19456 µg/L 11% of the EPA limit 30 µg/L | 1/4 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 1.9 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/3 | SYR4 | 2017–2019 |
87 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Aqua Pa Water Co Honesdale
Is Aqua Pa Water Co Honesdale tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 21 contaminants in Aqua Pa Water Co Honesdale's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Aqua Pa Water Co Honesdale's water?
EPA monitoring detected Copper, Lead, Arsenic, Barium, Chromium, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Aqua Pa Water Co Honesdale serve?
Aqua Pa Water Co Honesdale reports serving 5,500 people in Pennsylvania, per its EPA record.
Has Aqua Pa Water Co Honesdale had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 618 violations on file for Aqua Pa Water Co Honesdale, of which 74 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.