Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2021-04-01 → 2021-04-30 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2021-04-01 → 2021-04-30 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2021-04-01 → 2021-04-30 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2021-04-01 → 2021-04-30 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2021-04-01 → 2021-04-30 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2016-06-01 → 2016-06-30 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2016-06-01 → 2016-06-30 |
| Other | Monitoring | Unaddressed | 2025-10-11 |
| Other | Monitoring | Unaddressed | 2025-10-11 |
| Other | Monitoring | Unaddressed | 2025-07-11 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Copper | 506 µg/L 39% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L | 30/30 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| TTHM | 55 µg/L 69% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L | 10/10 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 10.1 µg/L 17% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L | 8/10 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 13.3 µg/L No EPA limit set | 7/7 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Chloroform | 45.1 µg/L No EPA limit set | 7/7 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 6.8 µg/L No EPA limit set | 7/7 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Bromoform | 1.4 µg/L No EPA limit set | 5/7 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 7.09 µg/L No EPA limit set | 5/5 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Lead | 12.7 µg/L 85% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L | 4/30 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Barium | 71 µg/L 3.6% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L | 3/3 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Arsenic | 3 µg/L 30% of the EPA limit 10 µg/L | 2/3 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 1.38 µg/L No EPA limit set | 2/5 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0099 mg/L 66% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 1/1 | LCR | 1993 |
67 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Monroe County Correctional Fac
Is Monroe County Correctional Fac tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 13 contaminants in Monroe County Correctional Fac's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Monroe County Correctional Fac's water?
EPA monitoring detected Copper, TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Monroe County Correctional Fac serve?
Monroe County Correctional Fac reports serving 740 people in Pennsylvania, per its EPA record.
Has Monroe County Correctional Fac had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 198 violations on file for Monroe County Correctional Fac, of which 7 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 8 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.