Tap WaterIndex

← Pennsylvania

Tap water quality report

Collegeville Trappe Joint Pwd

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 110 contaminants and detected 28. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

110
contaminants tested
28
detected
8,470
people served
22
health-based violations
Pennsylvania rankingsLead in PennsylvaniaPFAS in Pennsylvania
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Montgomery

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

22
health-based violations
439
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
TT Health-based Resolved 2017-04-01 → 2017-04-30
TT Health-based Resolved 2017-04-01 → 2017-04-30
TT Health-based Resolved 2014-08-01 → 2014-08-31
TT Health-based Resolved 2014-08-01 → 2014-08-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2004-05-01 → 2004-05-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2004-05-01 → 2004-05-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2004-05-01 → 2004-05-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 1993-05-01 → 1993-05-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 1993-05-01 → 1993-05-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 1993-05-01 → 1993-05-31

PFAS detected

PFAS are industrial “forever chemicals”. These are the EPA's latest nationwide test results (2023–2025).
ContaminantMaxDetection ratePeriod
PFBS 0.0153 µg/L 13/13 2023
Pfhxa 0.0109 µg/L 13/13 2023
PFOA 0.2350 µg/L 13/13 2023
PFOS 0.0150 µg/L 13/13 2023
Pfpea 0.0084 µg/L 13/13 2023
Pfhpa 0.0062 µg/L 10/13 2023
Pfba 0.0066 µg/L 5/13 2023
PFHXS 0.0042 µg/L 3/13 2023

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the single worst sample on record — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Nitrate
5810 µg/L 58%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
 186/186 SYR4 2012–2019
Copper
1280 µg/L 98%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
 63/63 SYR4 2013–2019
Lead
418 µg/L 2787%
of the EPA limit, in the worst sample — 15 µg/L
 44/63 SYR4 2013–2019
Bromoform
4.27 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 24/24 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
7.29 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 24/24 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
18.9 µg/L 24%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
 24/24 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromodichloromethane
6 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 22/22 SYR4 2012–2019
Barium
520 µg/L 26%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
 20/21 SYR4 2012–2018
Chloroform
2.9 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 19/24 SYR4 2012–2019
Arsenic
6 µg/L 60%
of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
 16/21 SYR4 2012–2018
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
3.38 µg/L 5.6%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
 14/18 SYR4 2012–2019
cis-1,2-Dichloroethylene
2.1 µg/L 3%
of the EPA limit 70 µg/L
 13/224 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0086 mg/L 57%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
 12/12 LCR 2025
Lithium
37 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 12/13 UCMR-5 2023
Combined Uranium
4.4849 µg/L 15%
of the EPA limit 30 µg/L
 9/10 SYR4 2014–2017
Trichloroethylene
0.9340 µg/L 19%
of the EPA limit 5 µg/L
 5/224 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
2.46 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 3/3 SYR4 2018–2019
Antimony, Total
0.6000 µg/L 10%
of the EPA limit 6 µg/L
 1/21 SYR4 2012–2018
Fluoride
117 µg/L 2.9%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
 1/25 SYR4 2012–2018
Xylenes, Total
1.83 µg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
 1/224 SYR4 2012–2019
82 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS2,3,7,8-TCDD2,4,5-TP2,4-D4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAsbestosAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChromiumDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDichloroacetic AcidDinosebDiquatEthylene DibromideEndothallEndrinEthylbenzeneGlyphosateHexachlorobenzeneHfpo-DaHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorMonobromoacetic AcidMonochloroacetic AcidNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaNitriteOxamylPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpsPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTotal Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB)ToxapheneTrichloroacetic AcidVinyl ChlorideO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
JOSEPH R HASTING
Phone
610-489-2831

Frequently asked questions about Collegeville Trappe Joint Pwd

Is Collegeville Trappe Joint Pwd tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 28 contaminants in Collegeville Trappe Joint Pwd's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Collegeville Trappe Joint Pwd's water?

EPA monitoring detected Nitrate, Copper, Lead, Bromoform, Dibromochloromethane, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Collegeville Trappe Joint Pwd serve?

Collegeville Trappe Joint Pwd reports serving 8,470 people in Pennsylvania, per its EPA record.

Has Collegeville Trappe Joint Pwd had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 439 violations on file for Collegeville Trappe Joint Pwd, of which 22 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.