Tap WaterIndex

← West Virginia

Tap water quality report

Umh Arbor Estates

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 80 contaminants and detected 19. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

80
contaminants tested
19
detected
920
people served
17
health-based violations
West Virginia rankingsLead in West VirginiaPFAS in West Virginia
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Private
Counties served
Bucks

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

17
health-based violations
165
violations on file
6
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
TT Health-based Resolved 2020-12-05
TT Health-based Resolved 2020-12-05
TT Health-based Resolved 2020-12-05
TT Health-based Resolved 2020-12-05
TT Health-based Resolved 2014-07-01 → 2014-07-31
TT Health-based Resolved 2014-07-01 → 2014-07-31
TT Health-based Resolved 2014-07-01 → 2014-07-31
TT Health-based Resolved 2014-07-01 → 2014-07-31
TT Health-based Resolved 2014-07-01 → 2014-07-31
TT Health-based Resolved 2014-07-01 → 2014-07-31

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Chloroform
15.8 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 31 µg/L
23/23 SYR4 2014–2019
Bromodichloromethane
19 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 31 µg/L
17/17 SYR4 2014–2019
Bromoform
3.4 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5 µg/L
17/17 SYR4 2014–2019
Dibromochloromethane
13.4 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 23 µg/L
17/17 SYR4 2014–2019
TTHM
59.2 µg/L 74%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 90 µg/L
15/15 SYR4 2014–2019
Nitrate
3290 µg/L 33%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
 14/16 SYR4 2012–2019
Copper
230.8 µg/L 18%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 421 µg/L
13/30 SYR4 2013–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
17.8 µg/L 30%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 22 µg/L
13/15 SYR4 2014–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
5.65 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 7 µg/L
10/12 SYR4 2016–2019
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
5.7175 µg/L 2.9%
of the EPA limit 200 µg/L
worst single sample: 6.05 µg/L
8/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
10.25 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 12 µg/L
8/12 SYR4 2016–2019
1,1-Dichloroethylene
1.67 µg/L 24%
of the EPA limit 7 µg/L
worst single sample: 1.7 µg/L
7/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
9.5 µg/L 63%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 11 µg/L
7/30 SYR4 2013–2019
Combined Uranium
16.3975 µg/L 55%
of the EPA limit 30 µg/L
worst single sample: 16.539 µg/L
6/6 SYR4 2012–2016
Trichloroacetic Acid
3.75 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4 µg/L
6/12 SYR4 2016–2019
Lead
0.0050 mg/L 33%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
 2/2 LCR 1996
Arsenic
1.8 µg/L 18%
of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
 1/3 SYR4 2012–2018
Carbon Tetrachloride
0.5000 µg/L 10%
of the EPA limit 5 µg/L
 1/8 SYR4 2012–2019
Tetrachloroethylene
0.5000 µg/L 10%
of the EPA limit 5 µg/L
 1/8 SYR4 2012–2019
61 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane2,3,7,8-TCDD2,4,5-TP2,4-DAntimony, TotalAsbestosAtrazineBhc-GammaBariumBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbofuranChlordaneChromiumDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDinosebDiquatEthylene DibromideEndothallEndrinEthylbenzeneFluorideGlyphosateHexachlorobenzeneHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorMonobromoacetic AcidMonochloroacetic AcidNitriteOxamylPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneThallium, TotalTolueneTotal Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB)ToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
JEFF YORICK
Phone
215-766-0351

Frequently asked questions about Umh Arbor Estates

Is Umh Arbor Estates tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 19 contaminants in Umh Arbor Estates's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Umh Arbor Estates's water?

EPA monitoring detected Chloroform, Bromodichloromethane, Bromoform, Dibromochloromethane, TTHM, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Umh Arbor Estates serve?

Umh Arbor Estates reports serving 920 people in West Virginia, per its EPA record.

Has Umh Arbor Estates had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 165 violations on file for Umh Arbor Estates, of which 17 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 6 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.