Tap WaterIndex

← Oklahoma

Tap water quality report

Rogers Co Rwd # 8

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 44 contaminants and detected 15. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

44
contaminants tested
15
detected
3,375
people served
0
health-based violations
Oklahoma rankingsLead in OklahomaPFAS in Oklahoma
Water source
SWP
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Rogers

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

0
health-based violations
6
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MR Monitoring Resolved 2012-06-01 → 2012-08-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2012-06-01 → 2012-08-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2012-06-01 → 2012-08-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2012-06-01 → 2012-08-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 1994-01-01 → 1995-06-21
MR Monitoring Resolved 1994-01-01 → 1995-06-21

PFAS detected

PFAS are industrial “forever chemicals”. These are the EPA's latest nationwide test results (2023–2025).
ContaminantMaxDetection ratePeriod
Pfba 0.0140 µg/L 1/4 2023

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the single worst sample on record — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Copper
418 µg/L 32%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
 71/74 SYR4 2014–2019
TTHM
133 µg/L 166%
of the EPA limit, in the worst sample — 80 µg/L
 66/66 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
79.2 µg/L 132%
of the EPA limit, in the worst sample — 60 µg/L
 65/66 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromodichloromethane
22.1 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 52/52 SYR4 2013–2019
Chloroform
85.1 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 52/52 SYR4 2013–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
39.8 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 52/52 SYR4 2013–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
32.4 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 52/52 SYR4 2013–2019
Dibromochloromethane
12.3 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 50/52 SYR4 2013–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
3.56 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 29/52 SYR4 2013–2019
Monochloroacetic Acid
6.75 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 11/52 SYR4 2013–2019
Lead
0.0010 mg/L 6.7%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
 7/7 LCR 2025
Monobromoacetic Acid
1.55 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 6/52 SYR4 2013–2019
Lead
59.3 µg/L 395%
of the EPA limit, in the worst sample — 15 µg/L
 5/74 SYR4 2014–2019
Bromoform
1.74 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 3/52 SYR4 2013–2019
29 contaminants tested, none detected
11Cl-PF3OUdS4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaHfpo-DaNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaPFBSPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfhxaPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPFOSPfpeaPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaLithium

Utility contact

Contact
ROGERS CO RWD # 8
Phone
918-341-4628
Email
ruralwaterdistrict8@gmail.com

Frequently asked questions about Rogers Co Rwd # 8

Is Rogers Co Rwd # 8 tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 15 contaminants in Rogers Co Rwd # 8's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Rogers Co Rwd # 8's water?

EPA monitoring detected Copper, TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Rogers Co Rwd # 8 serve?

Rogers Co Rwd # 8 reports serving 3,375 people in Oklahoma, per its EPA record.

Has Rogers Co Rwd # 8 had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 6 violations on file for Rogers Co Rwd # 8, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.