Is Pottawatomie Co Development Auth Tap Water Safe? Quality Report

Water source: SWP
Ownership: Local government
Counties served: Pottawatomie

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

health-based violations

violations on file

still open

Violation	Type	Status	Period
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2005-07-01 → 2005-07-31
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2005-07-01 → 2005-07-31
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2005-07-01 → 2005-07-31
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2005-07-01 → 2005-07-31
MR	Monitoring	Resolved	2016-09-01 → 2017-08-31
MR	Monitoring	Resolved	2016-09-01 → 2017-08-31
MR	Monitoring	Resolved	2016-09-01 → 2017-08-31
MR	Monitoring	Resolved	2016-09-01 → 2017-08-31
MR	Monitoring	Resolved	2016-09-01 → 2017-08-31
MR	Monitoring	Resolved	2016-09-01 → 2017-08-31

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.

Contaminant	Level vs EPA limit	Detection rate	Source	Period
Copper	96.97 µg/L 7.5% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L worst single sample: 126 µg/L	44/50	SYR4	2014–2018
TTHM	128.25 µg/L 160% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 80 µg/L worst single sample: 175.3 µg/L	27/27	SYR4	2013–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)	67.28 µg/L 112% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 60 µg/L worst single sample: 83.6 µg/L	27/27	SYR4	2013–2019
Bromodichloromethane	34.67 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 47.5 µg/L	23/23	SYR4	2013–2019
Chloroform	72.91 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 128 µg/L	23/23	SYR4	2013–2019
Dibromochloromethane	15.61 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 30.4 µg/L	23/23	SYR4	2013–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid	37.82 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 43.7 µg/L	23/23	SYR4	2013–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid	10.7 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 10.9 µg/L	21/23	SYR4	2013–2019
Bromoform	10.63 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 10.9 µg/L	19/23	SYR4	2013–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid	25.82 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 32 µg/L	13/23	SYR4	2013–2019
Lead	0.00070 mg/L 4.7% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L	11/11	LCR	2024
Monochloroacetic Acid	4.86 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 5.1 µg/L	9/23	SYR4	2013–2019
Monobromoacetic Acid	2.535 µg/L No EPA limit set worst single sample: 2.6 µg/L	2/23	SYR4	2013–2019

1 contaminants tested, none detected

Lead

Utility contact

Contact: POTT CO DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
Phone: 405-273-8064
Email: robbie@pcdawater.com

Frequently asked questions about Pottawatomie Co Development Auth

Is Pottawatomie Co Development Auth tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 13 contaminants in Pottawatomie Co Development Auth's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Pottawatomie Co Development Auth's water?

EPA monitoring detected Copper, TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Pottawatomie Co Development Auth serve?

Pottawatomie Co Development Auth reports serving 1,200 people in Oklahoma, per its EPA record.

Has Pottawatomie Co Development Auth had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 73 violations on file for Pottawatomie Co Development Auth, of which 4 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.