← Oklahoma

Tap water quality report

Mayes Co Rwd #4

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 44 contaminants and detected 15. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

44
contaminants tested
15
detected
4,183
people served
5
health-based violations
Water source
SWP
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Mayes

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

5
health-based violations
27
violations on file
4
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
TT Health-based Addressed 2024-10-17
TT Health-based Addressed 2024-10-17
MCL Health-based Resolved 1995-08-01 → 1995-08-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 1995-08-01 → 1995-08-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 1995-08-01 → 1995-08-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2025-07-01
MR Monitoring Resolved 2025-07-01
MR Monitoring Resolved 2025-07-01
MR Monitoring Resolved 2025-07-01
RPT Monitoring Addressed 2024-10-17

PFAS detected

PFAS are industrial “forever chemicals”. These are the EPA's latest nationwide test results (2023–2025).
ContaminantMaxDetection ratePeriod
Pfba 0.0170 µg/L 1/2 2025

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the single worst sample on record — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
TTHM
113 µg/L 141%
of the EPA limit, in the worst sample — 80 µg/L
64/64 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
109 µg/L 182%
of the EPA limit, in the worst sample — 60 µg/L
63/63 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromodichloromethane
21 µg/L
No EPA limit set
50/50 SYR4 2013–2019
Chloroform
88.9 µg/L
No EPA limit set
50/50 SYR4 2013–2019
Dibromochloromethane
9.62 µg/L
No EPA limit set
49/50 SYR4 2013–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
39.6 µg/L
No EPA limit set
49/49 SYR4 2013–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
30.8 µg/L
No EPA limit set
48/49 SYR4 2013–2019
Copper
305 µg/L 23%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
38/100 SYR4 2014–2017
Dibromoacetic Acid
2.27 µg/L
No EPA limit set
27/49 SYR4 2013–2019
Monochloroacetic Acid
6.76 µg/L
No EPA limit set
12/49 SYR4 2013–2019
Lead
0.0 mg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
10/10 LCR 2026
Monobromoacetic Acid
1.49 µg/L
No EPA limit set
10/49 SYR4 2013–2019
Lead
20.9 µg/L 139%
of the EPA limit, in the worst sample — 15 µg/L
3/100 SYR4 2014–2017
Bromoform
1.15 µg/L
No EPA limit set
2/50 SYR4 2013–2019
29 contaminants tested, none detected
11Cl-PF3OUdS4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaHfpo-DaNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaPFBSPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfhxaPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPFOSPfpeaPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaLithium

Utility contact

Contact
MAYES CO RWD # 4
Phone
918-825-4661
Email
field@mayes4.com

Frequently asked questions about Mayes Co Rwd #4

Is Mayes Co Rwd #4 tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 15 contaminants in Mayes Co Rwd #4's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Mayes Co Rwd #4's water?

EPA monitoring detected TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dibromochloromethane, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Mayes Co Rwd #4 serve?

Mayes Co Rwd #4 reports serving 4,183 people in Oklahoma, per its EPA record.

Has Mayes Co Rwd #4 had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 27 violations on file for Mayes Co Rwd #4, of which 5 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 4 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.