← Oklahoma

Tap water quality report

Consolidated Rwd #3 Creek Co

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 44 contaminants and detected 14. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

44
contaminants tested
14
detected
3,500
people served
37
health-based violations
Water source
SWP
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Creek

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

37
health-based violations
109
violations on file
5
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
TT Health-based Resolved 2024-10-17
TT Health-based Resolved 2024-10-17
MCL Health-based Resolved 2014-04-01 → 2014-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2014-04-01 → 2014-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2014-04-01 → 2014-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2014-04-01 → 2014-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2014-01-01 → 2014-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2014-01-01 → 2014-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2014-01-01 → 2014-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2014-01-01 → 2014-03-31

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the single worst sample on record — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Copper
571 µg/L 44%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
73/120 SYR4 2013–2019
TTHM
155.2 µg/L 194%
of the EPA limit, in the worst sample — 80 µg/L
42/42 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
79 µg/L 132%
of the EPA limit, in the worst sample — 60 µg/L
42/42 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromodichloromethane
26.3 µg/L
No EPA limit set
28/28 SYR4 2013–2019
Chloroform
40.8 µg/L
No EPA limit set
28/28 SYR4 2013–2019
Dibromochloromethane
21.5 µg/L
No EPA limit set
28/28 SYR4 2013–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
25.2 µg/L
No EPA limit set
28/28 SYR4 2013–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
20.5 µg/L
No EPA limit set
27/28 SYR4 2013–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
7.09 µg/L
No EPA limit set
26/28 SYR4 2013–2019
Bromoform
6.55 µg/L
No EPA limit set
21/28 SYR4 2013–2019
Monobromoacetic Acid
1.68 µg/L
No EPA limit set
6/28 SYR4 2013–2019
Lead
0.0 mg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
5/5 LCR 2019
Lead
61.7 µg/L 411%
of the EPA limit, in the worst sample — 15 µg/L
4/120 SYR4 2013–2019
Monochloroacetic Acid
3.66 µg/L
No EPA limit set
3/28 SYR4 2013–2019
30 contaminants tested, none detected
11Cl-PF3OUdS4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaHfpo-DaNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaPfbaPFBSPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfhxaPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPFOSPfpeaPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaLithium

Utility contact

Contact
CONSOLIDATED RWD #3 CREEK CO
Phone
918-224-3727
Email
ccrwd3@hotmail.com

Frequently asked questions about Consolidated Rwd #3 Creek Co

Is Consolidated Rwd #3 Creek Co tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 14 contaminants in Consolidated Rwd #3 Creek Co's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Consolidated Rwd #3 Creek Co's water?

EPA monitoring detected Copper, TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Consolidated Rwd #3 Creek Co serve?

Consolidated Rwd #3 Creek Co reports serving 3,500 people in Oklahoma, per its EPA record.

Has Consolidated Rwd #3 Creek Co had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 109 violations on file for Consolidated Rwd #3 Creek Co, of which 37 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 5 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.