Is Craig Co Rwd #2 Tap Water Safe? Quality Report

Water source: SWP
Ownership: Local government
Counties served: Craig

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

health-based violations

violations on file

still open

Violation	Type	Status	Period
TT	Health-based	Resolved	2024-10-17
TT	Health-based	Resolved	2024-10-17
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2022-01-01 → 2022-03-31
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2022-01-01 → 2022-03-31
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2022-01-01 → 2022-03-31
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2022-01-01 → 2022-03-31
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2021-07-01 → 2021-09-30
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2021-07-01 → 2021-09-30
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2021-07-01 → 2021-09-30
MCL	Health-based	Resolved	2021-07-01 → 2021-09-30

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the single worst sample on record — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Formal violations are listed separately.

Contaminant	Level vs EPA limit	Detection rate	Source	Period
Copper	908 µg/L 70% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L	83/101	SYR4	2014–2017
Bromodichloromethane	17.83 µg/L No EPA limit set	49/49	SYR4	2013–2019
Chloroform	77.78 µg/L No EPA limit set	49/49	SYR4	2013–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid	52.76 µg/L No EPA limit set	49/49	SYR4	2013–2019
TTHM	97 µg/L 121% of the EPA limit, in the worst sample — 80 µg/L	49/49	SYR4	2013–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)	105.98 µg/L 177% of the EPA limit, in the worst sample — 60 µg/L	49/49	SYR4	2013–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid	46.78 µg/L No EPA limit set	49/49	SYR4	2013–2019
Dibromochloromethane	3.94 µg/L No EPA limit set	45/49	SYR4	2013–2019
Monochloroacetic Acid	13.79 µg/L No EPA limit set	27/49	SYR4	2013–2019
Lead	0.0014 mg/L 9.3% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L	14/14	LCR	2025
Lead	36.5 µg/L 243% of the EPA limit, in the worst sample — 15 µg/L	4/101	SYR4	2014–2017
Dibromoacetic Acid	1.22 µg/L No EPA limit set	2/49	SYR4	2013–2019
Monobromoacetic Acid	1.22 µg/L No EPA limit set	2/49	SYR4	2013–2019

31 contaminants tested, none detected

11Cl-PF3OUdS4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaBromoformHfpo-DaNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaPfbaPFBSPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfhxaPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPFOSPfpeaPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaLithium

Utility contact

Contact: CRAIG CO RWD #2
Phone: 918-256-1145
Email: CCWD2@junct.com

Frequently asked questions about Craig Co Rwd #2

Is Craig Co Rwd #2 tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 13 contaminants in Craig Co Rwd #2's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Craig Co Rwd #2's water?

EPA monitoring detected Copper, Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dichloroacetic Acid, TTHM, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Craig Co Rwd #2 serve?

Craig Co Rwd #2 reports serving 4,250 people in Oklahoma, per its EPA record.

Has Craig Co Rwd #2 had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 63 violations on file for Craig Co Rwd #2, of which 39 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.