← Oklahoma

Tap water quality report

Choctaw Co. Rwsg & Swmd #6

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 14 contaminants and detected 12. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

14
contaminants tested
12
detected
850
people served
464
health-based violations
Water source
SWP
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Choctaw

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

464
health-based violations
656
violations on file
20
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Archived 2025-10-01 → 2025-12-31
MCL Health-based Archived 2025-10-01 → 2025-12-31
MCL Health-based Archived 2025-10-01 → 2025-12-31
MCL Health-based Archived 2025-10-01 → 2025-12-31
MCL Health-based Archived 2025-10-01 → 2025-12-31
MCL Health-based Archived 2025-10-01 → 2025-12-31
MCL Health-based Archived 2025-10-01 → 2025-12-31
MCL Health-based Archived 2025-10-01 → 2025-12-31
MCL Health-based Archived 2025-10-01 → 2025-12-31
MCL Health-based Archived 2025-07-01 → 2025-09-30

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the single worst sample on record — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Copper
5338.1 µg/L 411%
of the EPA limit, in the worst sample — 1300 µg/L
100/100 SYR4 2014–2019
Lead
416.5 µg/L 2777%
of the EPA limit, in the worst sample — 15 µg/L
56/100 SYR4 2014–2019
TTHM
650 µg/L 813%
of the EPA limit, in the worst sample — 80 µg/L
38/42 SYR4 2014–2019
Chloroform
438 µg/L
No EPA limit set
37/42 SYR4 2014–2019
Bromodichloromethane
22.2 µg/L
No EPA limit set
36/42 SYR4 2014–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
78.9 µg/L
No EPA limit set
32/42 SYR4 2014–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
170.1 µg/L 284%
of the EPA limit, in the worst sample — 60 µg/L
32/42 SYR4 2014–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
86.9 µg/L
No EPA limit set
28/42 SYR4 2014–2019
Dibromochloromethane
3.58 µg/L
No EPA limit set
22/42 SYR4 2014–2019
Monochloroacetic Acid
8.8 µg/L
No EPA limit set
10/42 SYR4 2014–2019
Lead
0.0078 mg/L 52%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
9/9 LCR 2025
Bromoform
650 µg/L
No EPA limit set
4/42 SYR4 2014–2019
2 contaminants tested, none detected
Dibromoacetic AcidMonobromoacetic Acid

Utility contact

Contact
CHOCTAW COUNTY RWSG & SWMD # 6
Phone
580-566-1906
Email
jean_bacon@hotmail.com

Frequently asked questions about Choctaw Co. Rwsg & Swmd #6

Is Choctaw Co. Rwsg & Swmd #6 tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 12 contaminants in Choctaw Co. Rwsg & Swmd #6's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Choctaw Co. Rwsg & Swmd #6's water?

EPA monitoring detected Copper, Lead, TTHM, Chloroform, Bromodichloromethane, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Choctaw Co. Rwsg & Swmd #6 serve?

Choctaw Co. Rwsg & Swmd #6 reports serving 850 people in Oklahoma, per its EPA record.

Has Choctaw Co. Rwsg & Swmd #6 had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 656 violations on file for Choctaw Co. Rwsg & Swmd #6, of which 464 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 20 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.