← Oklahoma

Tap water quality report

Joseph Harp Corr Inst

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 63 contaminants and detected 17. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

63
contaminants tested
17
detected
3,000
people served
5
health-based violations
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
State government
Counties served
Cleveland

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

5
health-based violations
512
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 1998-05-01 → 1998-05-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 1997-07-01 → 1997-07-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 1993-10-01 → 1993-10-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 1993-09-01 → 1993-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 1992-06-01 → 1992-06-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2025-11-01 → 2025-11-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2025-11-01 → 2025-11-30
MR Monitoring Resolved 2025-11-01 → 2025-11-30
MON Monitoring Resolved 2025-11-01 → 2025-11-30
MON Monitoring Resolved 2025-11-01 → 2025-11-30

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Nitrate-Nitrite
492 µg/L 4.9%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 510 µg/L
29/41 SYR4 2012–2019
Barium
478.8 µg/L 24%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 500 µg/L
23/23 SYR4 2012–2018
Copper
44.1 µg/L 3.4%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 48.1 µg/L
21/40 SYR4 2013–2017
Combined Uranium
21.195 µg/L 71%
of the EPA limit 30 µg/L
worst single sample: 28.7 µg/L
20/20 SYR4 2012–2018
Chromium
39.52 µg/L 40%
of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
worst single sample: 41.5 µg/L
19/23 SYR4 2012–2018
Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U
13.91 pCi/L 93%
of the EPA limit 15 pCi/L
worst single sample: 15.8 pCi/L
19/20 SYR4 2012–2018
Gross Beta Particle Activity
10.4235 pCi/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 10.5 pCi/L
18/20 SYR4 2012–2018
Arsenic
5.89 µg/L 59%
of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
worst single sample: 6.8 µg/L
14/23 SYR4 2012–2018
Lead
0.0 mg/L 0%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
14/14 LCR 2023
Fluoride
404 µg/L 10%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 410 µg/L
13/23 SYR4 2012–2018
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)
1.468 pCi/L 29%
of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
worst single sample: 1.66 pCi/L
9/20 SYR4 2012–2018
Diquat
3.12 µg/L 16%
of the EPA limit 20 µg/L
worst single sample: 3.3 µg/L
4/39 SYR4 2019
Nitrate
250 µg/L 2.5%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
4/6 SYR4 2012–2018
Bromoform
6 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 6.5 µg/L
3/22 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
6 µg/L 7.5%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 6.5 µg/L
3/8 SYR4 2014–2019
Mercury
0.0980 µg/L 4.9%
of the EPA limit 2 µg/L
worst single sample: 0.1000 µg/L
2/23 SYR4 2012–2018
Selenium
13.895 µg/L 28%
of the EPA limit 50 µg/L
worst single sample: 14 µg/L
2/23 SYR4 2012–2018
46 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-DIBROMO-3-CHLOROPROPANE1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane2,4,5-TP2,4-DAntimony, TotalBenzeneBeryllium, TotalBromodichloromethaneChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbon TetrachlorideChloroformDichloromethaneDalaponDibromoacetic AcidDibromochloromethaneDichloroacetic AcidDinosebEthylene DibromideEthylbenzeneGlyphosateLeadMonobromoacetic AcidMonochloroacetic AcidNitritePentachlorophenolPicloramStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTotal Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)Trichloroacetic AcidTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
JOSEPH HARP CORR INST
Phone
405-527-4847
Email
clay.bagley@doc.ok.gov

Frequently asked questions about Joseph Harp Corr Inst

Is Joseph Harp Corr Inst tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 17 contaminants in Joseph Harp Corr Inst's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Joseph Harp Corr Inst's water?

EPA monitoring detected Nitrate-Nitrite, Barium, Copper, Combined Uranium, Chromium, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Joseph Harp Corr Inst serve?

Joseph Harp Corr Inst reports serving 3,000 people in Oklahoma, per its EPA record.

Has Joseph Harp Corr Inst had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 512 violations on file for Joseph Harp Corr Inst, of which 5 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.