Tap WaterIndex

← Oklahoma

Tap water quality report

Mack Alford Correctional Center

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 50 contaminants and detected 20. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

50
contaminants tested
20
detected
952
people served
238
health-based violations
Oklahoma rankingsLead in OklahomaPFAS in Oklahoma
Water source
Surface water
Ownership
State government
Counties served
Atoka

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

238
health-based violations
276
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Archived 2024-04-01 → 2024-06-30
MCL Health-based Archived 2024-04-01 → 2024-06-30
MCL Health-based Archived 2024-04-01 → 2024-06-30
MCL Health-based Archived 2024-04-01 → 2024-06-30
MCL Health-based Archived 2023-10-01 → 2023-12-31
MCL Health-based Archived 2023-10-01 → 2023-12-31
MCL Health-based Archived 2023-10-01 → 2023-12-31
MCL Health-based Archived 2023-10-01 → 2023-12-31
MCL Health-based Archived 2023-07-01 → 2023-09-30
MCL Health-based Archived 2023-07-01 → 2023-09-30

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Bromodichloromethane
14.66 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 20.7 µg/L
57/57 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
85 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 98.3 µg/L
57/57 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
99.16 µg/L 124%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 114.3 µg/L
57/57 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
64.72 µg/L 108%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 78.6 µg/L
52/57 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
36.75 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 47.9 µg/L
51/57 SYR4 2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
29.05 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 30.8 µg/L
51/57 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
5.6225 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 9.78 µg/L
36/57 SYR4 2012–2019
Copper
105.95 µg/L 8.2%
of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 200 µg/L
20/20 SYR4 2014–2017
Lead
0.0028 mg/L 19%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
 12/12 LCR 2023
Monochloroacetic Acid
3.189 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.27 µg/L
10/57 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
5.3402 µg/L 36%
of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 6.44 µg/L
5/20 SYR4 2014–2017
Nitrate-Nitrite
370 µg/L 3.7%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
 4/16 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromoform
9.026 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 9.57 µg/L
3/57 SYR4 2012–2019
Monobromoacetic Acid
2.536 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.58 µg/L
3/57 SYR4 2012–2019
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)
1.4591 pCi/L 29%
of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
worst single sample: 1.49 pCi/L
2/2 SYR4 2013–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
1.818 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.82 µg/L
2/57 SYR4 2012–2019
Gross Beta Particle Activity
3.4085 pCi/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.51 pCi/L
2/2 SYR4 2013–2019
Barium
67 µg/L 3.4%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
 1/1 SYR4 2013
Fluoride
100 µg/L 2.5%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
 1/1 SYR4 2013
Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U
0.9530 pCi/L 6.4%
of the EPA limit 15 pCi/L
 1/2 SYR4 2013–2019
30 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-DichloropropaneAntimony, TotalArsenicBenzeneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCadmiumCarbon TetrachlorideChromiumCombined UraniumDichloromethaneEthylbenzeneMercurySeleniumStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTrichloroethyleneVinyl ChlorideXylenes, Totalcis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
MACK ALFORD CORR. CENTER
Phone
580-346-7301
Email
margaret.green@doc.ok.gov

Frequently asked questions about Mack Alford Correctional Center

Is Mack Alford Correctional Center tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 20 contaminants in Mack Alford Correctional Center's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Mack Alford Correctional Center's water?

EPA monitoring detected Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Dichloroacetic Acid, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Mack Alford Correctional Center serve?

Mack Alford Correctional Center reports serving 952 people in Oklahoma, per its EPA record.

Has Mack Alford Correctional Center had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 276 violations on file for Mack Alford Correctional Center, of which 238 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.