Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2024-09-05 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2024-09-05 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2022-08-17 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2022-08-17 |
| Other | Monitoring | Unaddressed | 2018-11-09 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2013-10-01 → 2013-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2013-10-01 → 2013-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2013-10-01 → 2013-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2013-10-01 → 2013-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 1997-01-01 → 1997-03-31 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Copper | 808 µg/L 62% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L | 122/130 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 11.56 µg/L No EPA limit set | 72/72 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 20.47 µg/L No EPA limit set | 72/72 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 10.98 µg/L No EPA limit set | 72/72 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromoform | 4.08 µg/L No EPA limit set | 71/72 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 4 µg/L No EPA limit set | 70/71 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| TTHM | 40.19 µg/L 50% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L | 70/70 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 17.6 µg/L 117% of the EPA limit, in the worst sample — 15 µg/L | 67/130 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 15.65 µg/L 26% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L | 55/71 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 7.51 µg/L No EPA limit set | 52/71 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0013 mg/L 8.7% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 30/30 | LCR | 2026 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 6.235 µg/L No EPA limit set | 22/71 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Nitrate | 912 µg/L 9.1% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 16/16 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Nitrate-Nitrite | 912 µg/L 9.1% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 4/4 | SYR4 | 2012–2017 |
| Barium | 98.1 µg/L 4.9% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L | 3/3 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Fluoride | 1100 µg/L 28% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L | 3/3 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid | 2.4 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/71 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
66 contaminants tested, none detected
Frequently asked questions about Warren County
Is Warren County tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 17 contaminants in Warren County's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Warren County's water?
EPA monitoring detected Copper, Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dibromochloromethane, Bromoform, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Warren County serve?
Warren County reports serving 81,975 people, per its EPA record.
Has Warren County had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 153 violations on file for Warren County, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 1 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.