Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Monitoring | Unaddressed | 2019-01-25 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 1995-01-01 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 1995-01-01 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 1995-01-01 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 1995-01-01 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bromodichloromethane | 13.875 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 16.2 µg/L | 56/56 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 74.325 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 97.9 µg/L | 56/56 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 32.275 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 39 µg/L | 56/56 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| TTHM | 82.85 µg/L 104% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 100 µg/L | 56/56 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 40.25 µg/L 67% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 48.9 µg/L | 56/56 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 9 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 13.2 µg/L | 48/56 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Copper | 61.42 µg/L 4.7% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 74.3 µg/L | 35/44 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 2.7275 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.83 µg/L | 26/56 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0 mg/L 0% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 26/26 | LCR | 2025 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 9.5465 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 10.6 µg/L | 24/56 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 2.7575 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.87 µg/L | 4/56 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 26.9 µg/L 179% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 27.3 µg/L | 3/44 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid | 1.03 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/56 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
1 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Trumbull Co. - Mineral Ridge
Is Trumbull Co. - Mineral Ridge tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 13 contaminants in Trumbull Co. - Mineral Ridge's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Trumbull Co. - Mineral Ridge's water?
EPA monitoring detected Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dichloroacetic Acid, TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Trumbull Co. - Mineral Ridge serve?
Trumbull Co. - Mineral Ridge reports serving 2,858 people in Ohio, per its EPA record.
Has Trumbull Co. - Mineral Ridge had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 5 violations on file for Trumbull Co. - Mineral Ridge, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 1 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.