Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2017-07-01 → 2017-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2017-07-01 → 2017-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2017-07-01 → 2017-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2017-07-01 → 2017-09-30 |
| RPT | Monitoring | Resolved | 2025-07-02 |
| RPT | Monitoring | Resolved | 2025-07-02 |
| RPT | Monitoring | Resolved | 2025-07-02 |
| Other | Monitoring | Unaddressed | 2021-01-08 |
| Other | Monitoring | Unaddressed | 2020-02-28 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 1992-11-01 → 1992-11-30 |
PFAS detected
| Contaminant | Max | Detection rate | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pfba | 0.0055 µg/L | 1/4 | 2023 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Copper | 805.8 µg/L 62% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L
worst single sample: 917 µg/L | 79/80 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 14.755 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 17.1 µg/L | 60/60 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 73.285 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 78.6 µg/L | 60/60 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 34.625 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 38.9 µg/L | 60/60 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| TTHM | 88.91 µg/L 111% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 96.4 µg/L | 60/60 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 70.61 µg/L 118% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 108 µg/L | 60/60 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 33.89 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 69.9 µg/L | 60/60 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 2.121 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 7.9 µg/L | 58/60 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0043 mg/L 29% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 23/23 | LCR | 2025 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 4.6585 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 7.71 µg/L | 18/60 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 11.8 µg/L 79% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L
worst single sample: 14.2 µg/L | 16/79 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 2.38 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.8 µg/L | 7/60 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid | 12.21 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 12.6 µg/L | 7/60 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
30 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Hubbard City
Is Hubbard City tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 14 contaminants in Hubbard City's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Hubbard City's water?
EPA monitoring detected Copper, Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dichloroacetic Acid, TTHM, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Hubbard City serve?
Hubbard City reports serving 8,518 people in Ohio, per its EPA record.
Has Hubbard City had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 13 violations on file for Hubbard City, of which 4 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 2 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.