Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2024-01-01 → 2024-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2024-01-01 → 2024-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2024-01-01 → 2024-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2024-01-01 → 2024-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2024-01-01 → 2024-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2024-01-01 → 2024-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2024-01-01 → 2024-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2024-01-01 → 2024-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2009-07-02 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2009-07-02 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Copper | 51 µg/L 3.9% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L | 19/60 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 13.8 µg/L No EPA limit set | 16/16 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromoform | 14.2 µg/L No EPA limit set | 16/16 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 8.7 µg/L No EPA limit set | 16/16 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 5.4 µg/L No EPA limit set | 16/16 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 19.1 µg/L No EPA limit set | 16/16 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 2.2 µg/L No EPA limit set | 16/16 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| TTHM | 54.1 µg/L 68% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L | 16/16 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0 mg/L 0% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 15/15 | LCR | 2025 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 8 µg/L 13% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L | 11/16 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 11 µg/L 73% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L | 5/60 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Lithium | 14.7 µg/L No EPA limit set | 2/2 | UCMR-5 | 2023 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 1.2 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/16 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
31 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Stark County Water District
Is Stark County Water District tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 13 contaminants in Stark County Water District's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Stark County Water District's water?
EPA monitoring detected Copper, Bromodichloromethane, Bromoform, Chloroform, Dibromoacetic Acid, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Stark County Water District serve?
Stark County Water District reports serving 6,690 people in Ohio, per its EPA record.
Has Stark County Water District had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 14 violations on file for Stark County Water District, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.