Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2001-09-01 → 2001-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2001-09-01 → 2001-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2001-09-01 → 2001-09-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 2001-09-01 → 2001-09-30 |
| RPT | Monitoring | Resolved | 2025-07-02 |
| RPT | Monitoring | Resolved | 2025-07-02 |
| RPT | Monitoring | Resolved | 2025-07-02 |
| Other | Monitoring | Unaddressed | 2021-11-24 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2020-07-01 → 2020-09-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2020-07-01 → 2020-09-30 |
PFAS detected
| Contaminant | Max | Detection rate | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| PFHXS | 0.0042 µg/L | 1/1 | 2025 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Copper | 1920 µg/L 148% of the EPA limit, in the worst sample — 1300 µg/L | 124/241 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 42.6 µg/L No EPA limit set | 43/43 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 32.9 µg/L No EPA limit set | 43/43 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| TTHM | 125 µg/L 156% of the EPA limit, in the worst sample — 80 µg/L | 43/43 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 66.4 µg/L No EPA limit set | 41/43 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 18.4 µg/L No EPA limit set | 34/43 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 30.9 µg/L 52% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L | 29/43 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 21 µg/L No EPA limit set | 28/43 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromoform | 6.7 µg/L No EPA limit set | 27/43 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 3.3 µg/L No EPA limit set | 26/43 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0013 mg/L 8.7% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 25/25 | LCR | 2025 |
| Nitrate | 380 µg/L 3.8% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 6/20 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Barium | 147 µg/L 7.4% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L | 5/5 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Lead | 16.2 µg/L 108% of the EPA limit, in the worst sample — 15 µg/L | 5/241 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Nitrate-Nitrite | 380 µg/L 3.8% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 3/10 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Fluoride | 1370 µg/L 34% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L | 2/5 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Arsenic | 3 µg/L 30% of the EPA limit 10 µg/L | 1/5 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid | 2.3 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/43 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
65 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Scioto Water Inc.-Sugar Camp
Is Scioto Water Inc.-Sugar Camp tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 19 contaminants in Scioto Water Inc.-Sugar Camp's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Scioto Water Inc.-Sugar Camp's water?
EPA monitoring detected Copper, Bromodichloromethane, Dibromochloromethane, TTHM, Chloroform, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Scioto Water Inc.-Sugar Camp serve?
Scioto Water Inc.-Sugar Camp reports serving 6,458 people in Ohio, per its EPA record.
Has Scioto Water Inc.-Sugar Camp had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 29 violations on file for Scioto Water Inc.-Sugar Camp, of which 4 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 1 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.