Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Monitoring | Unaddressed | 2025-11-10 |
| RPT | Monitoring | Resolved | 2025-07-02 |
| RPT | Monitoring | Resolved | 2025-07-02 |
| RPT | Monitoring | Resolved | 2025-07-02 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2020-11-13 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2020-11-13 |
| Other | Monitoring | Unaddressed | 2019-01-10 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2010-11-01 → 2010-11-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2010-11-01 → 2010-11-30 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2010-11-01 → 2010-11-30 |
PFAS detected
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Copper | 60 µg/L 4.6% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L | 134/144 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 14 µg/L No EPA limit set | 64/65 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 78.7 µg/L No EPA limit set | 64/65 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 10.8 µg/L No EPA limit set | 64/65 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| TTHM | 96 µg/L 120% of the EPA limit, in the worst sample — 80 µg/L | 64/65 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 31.2 µg/L 52% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L | 64/64 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 4.4 µg/L No EPA limit set | 57/64 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 23.4 µg/L No EPA limit set | 57/64 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromoform | 5 µg/L No EPA limit set | 49/65 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 4.1 µg/L No EPA limit set | 35/64 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0 mg/L 0% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 27/27 | LCR | 2025 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 4 µg/L No EPA limit set | 12/64 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 41 µg/L 273% of the EPA limit, in the worst sample — 15 µg/L | 7/144 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
28 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Waterville City
Is Waterville City tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 16 contaminants in Waterville City's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Waterville City's water?
EPA monitoring detected Copper, Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dibromochloromethane, TTHM, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Waterville City serve?
Waterville City reports serving 6,500 people in Ohio, per its EPA record.
Has Waterville City had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 15 violations on file for Waterville City, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 2 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.