Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Monitoring | Unaddressed | 2019-01-23 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2012-01-01 → 2012-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2012-01-01 → 2012-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2012-01-01 → 2012-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2012-01-01 → 2012-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2012-01-01 → 2012-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2012-01-01 → 2012-12-31 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2003-07-01 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2003-07-01 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2002-07-01 → 2002-12-31 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lead | 0.0 mg/L 0% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 21/21 | LCR | 2025 |
| Copper | 80 µg/L 6.2% of the EPA limit 1300 µg/L | 19/20 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 3.8 µg/L No EPA limit set | 10/10 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromoform | 24.7 µg/L No EPA limit set | 10/10 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 8.9 µg/L No EPA limit set | 10/10 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| TTHM | 35.7 µg/L 45% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L | 8/8 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 14.8 µg/L 25% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L | 7/7 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 4.4 µg/L No EPA limit set | 6/7 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 7.3 µg/L No EPA limit set | 3/7 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Barium | 207 µg/L 10% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L | 2/2 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Chloroform | 4 µg/L No EPA limit set | 2/10 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 7.5 µg/L No EPA limit set | 2/7 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Nitrate | 120 µg/L 1.2% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 2/16 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lithium | 13.9 µg/L No EPA limit set | 2/2 | UCMR-5 | 2025 |
| Fluoride | 290 µg/L 7.2% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L | 1/2 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Lead | 2 µg/L 13% of the EPA limit 15 µg/L | 1/20 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Nitrate-Nitrite | 120 µg/L 1.2% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 1/8 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
65 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Scranton Woods
Is Scranton Woods tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 17 contaminants in Scranton Woods's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Scranton Woods's water?
EPA monitoring detected Lead, Copper, Bromodichloromethane, Bromoform, Dibromochloromethane, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Scranton Woods serve?
Scranton Woods reports serving 114 people in Ohio, per its EPA record.
Has Scranton Woods had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 20 violations on file for Scranton Woods, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 1 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.