← New York

Tap water quality report

Keeler Field

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 75 contaminants and detected 18. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

75
contaminants tested
18
detected
100
people served
4
health-based violations
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Westchester

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

4
health-based violations
22
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 2016-03-01 → 2016-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2016-03-01 → 2016-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2016-03-01 → 2016-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2016-03-01 → 2016-03-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2018-01-01 → 2018-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2018-01-01 → 2018-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2018-01-01 → 2018-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2018-01-01 → 2018-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2018-01-01 → 2018-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2018-01-01 → 2018-12-31

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Lead
0.0167 mg/L 111%
above the EPA limit of 0.0150 mg/L
20/20 LCR 2025
Nitrate
3250 µg/L 33%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
18/20 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
43.1275 µg/L 54%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 145 µg/L
16/17 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
1.45 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.62 µg/L
11/14 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromoform
1.873 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.26 µg/L
10/14 SYR4 2012–2019
Nitrate-Nitrite
3226 µg/L 32%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 3250 µg/L
9/10 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
6.2385 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 6.9 µg/L
8/12 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
4.681 µg/L 7.8%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 4.93 µg/L
7/14 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromodichloromethane
1.21 µg/L
No EPA limit set
6/12 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
2.074 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.2 µg/L
4/12 SYR4 2012–2019
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)
0.9729 pCi/L 19%
of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
worst single sample: 0.9780 pCi/L
3/3 SYR4 2016–2018
Combined Uranium
1.92061 µg/L 6.4%
of the EPA limit 30 µg/L
worst single sample: 1.9817 µg/L
3/3 SYR4 2016–2018
Trichloroacetic Acid
1.746 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.8 µg/L
3/12 SYR4 2012–2019
Barium
68.165 µg/L 3.4%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 68.4 µg/L
2/3 SYR4 2013–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
0.8000 µg/L
No EPA limit set
1/12 SYR4 2012–2019
Fluoride
50 µg/L 1.3%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
1/3 SYR4 2013–2019
Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U
0.7400 pCi/L 4.9%
of the EPA limit 15 pCi/L
1/1 SYR4 2018
Gross Beta Particle Activity
2.01 pCi/L
No EPA limit set
1/1 SYR4 2018
57 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane2,4,5-TP2,4-DAntimony, TotalArsenicAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChromiumDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDinosebEthylene DibromideEndrinEthylbenzeneHexachlorobenzeneHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorMonobromoacetic AcidMonochloroacetic AcidNitriteOxamylPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTotal Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB)ToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl Chloridecis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
GONCALVES, TONY
Phone
914-763-3151
Email
supervisor@lewisborogov.com

Frequently asked questions about Keeler Field

Is Keeler Field tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 18 contaminants in Keeler Field's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Keeler Field's water?

EPA monitoring detected Lead, Nitrate, TTHM, Dibromochloromethane, Bromoform, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Keeler Field serve?

Keeler Field reports serving 100 people in New York, per its EPA record.

Has Keeler Field had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 22 violations on file for Keeler Field, of which 4 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.