Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| MON | Monitoring | Resolved | 2020-07-01 → 2020-07-31 |
| MON | Monitoring | Resolved | 2020-07-01 → 2020-07-31 |
| MON | Monitoring | Resolved | 2020-07-01 → 2020-07-31 |
| MON | Monitoring | Resolved | 2020-07-01 → 2020-07-31 |
| MON | Monitoring | Resolved | 2019-07-01 → 2019-07-31 |
| MON | Monitoring | Resolved | 2019-07-01 → 2019-07-31 |
| MON | Monitoring | Resolved | 2019-07-01 → 2019-07-31 |
| MON | Monitoring | Resolved | 2019-07-01 → 2019-07-31 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bromodichloromethane | 6.0175 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 6.05 µg/L | 14/14 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 10.209 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 12.9 µg/L | 14/14 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 6.769 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 6.86 µg/L | 14/14 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| TTHM | 18.8115 µg/L 24% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 19 µg/L | 14/14 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0022 mg/L 15% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 12/12 | LCR | 2025 |
| Bromoform | 3.8225 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.89 µg/L | 10/14 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 5.318 µg/L 8.9% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 5.36 µg/L | 8/14 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 3.529 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.12 µg/L | 7/14 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 2.9955 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.21 µg/L | 4/14 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 1.01 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/14 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
2 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about North Castle Water District #5
Is North Castle Water District #5 tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 10 contaminants in North Castle Water District #5's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in North Castle Water District #5's water?
EPA monitoring detected Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dibromochloromethane, TTHM, Lead, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does North Castle Water District #5 serve?
North Castle Water District #5 reports serving 225 people in New York, per its EPA record.
Has North Castle Water District #5 had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 8 violations on file for North Castle Water District #5, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.