Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2011-05-01 → 2011-05-31 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2011-05-01 → 2011-05-31 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2011-05-01 → 2011-05-31 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2011-05-01 → 2011-05-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2015-10-01 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2015-10-01 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2015-10-01 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2015-10-01 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2004-06-01 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2004-06-01 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nitrate | 131 µg/L 1.3% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 16/16 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0010 mg/L 6.7% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 14/14 | LCR | 2024 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 2.3415 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.6 µg/L | 12/12 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Bromoform | 1.2135 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.23 µg/L | 12/12 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Chloroform | 6.4515 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 8.47 µg/L | 12/12 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 2.215 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2.6 µg/L | 12/12 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| TTHM | 10.614 µg/L 13% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 13.32 µg/L | 12/12 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Nitrate-Nitrite | 128.9 µg/L 1.3% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 131 µg/L | 8/8 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Combined Radium (-226 And -228) | 4.076 pCi/L 82% of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
worst single sample: 4.12 pCi/L | 5/5 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U | 3.276 pCi/L 22% of the EPA limit 15 pCi/L
worst single sample: 3.43 pCi/L | 5/5 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Gross Beta Particle Activity | 10.66 pCi/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 10.7 pCi/L | 5/5 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Barium | 168.9 µg/L 8.4% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 169 µg/L | 3/3 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Chromium | 3.25 µg/L 3.3% of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
worst single sample: 3.4 µg/L | 3/3 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 4.439 µg/L 7.4% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 4.76 µg/L | 3/12 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Fluoride | 189.5 µg/L 4.7% of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 190 µg/L | 2/3 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Cyanide | 0.9000 µg/L 0.5% of the EPA limit 200 µg/L | 1/3 | SYR4 | 2012–2018 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 1 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/12 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 3.3 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/12 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 1.55 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/12 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 1.46 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/12 | SYR4 | 2014–2019 |
55 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Cedar Downs Water District
Is Cedar Downs Water District tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 20 contaminants in Cedar Downs Water District's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Cedar Downs Water District's water?
EPA monitoring detected Nitrate, Lead, Bromodichloromethane, Bromoform, Chloroform, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Cedar Downs Water District serve?
Cedar Downs Water District reports serving 195 people in New York, per its EPA record.
Has Cedar Downs Water District had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 15 violations on file for Cedar Downs Water District, of which 4 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.