← New York

Tap water quality report

High Falls Water District

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 12 contaminants and detected 8. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

12
contaminants tested
8
detected
426
people served
0
health-based violations
Water source
SWP
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Ulster

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

0
health-based violations
15
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
RPT Monitoring Resolved 2024-10-17
RPT Monitoring Resolved 2024-10-17
RPT Monitoring Resolved 2024-10-17
MON Monitoring Resolved 2024-02-01 → 2024-02-29
MON Monitoring Resolved 2024-02-01 → 2024-02-29
MON Monitoring Resolved 2024-02-01 → 2024-02-29
MR Monitoring Resolved 2023-01-01 → 2023-03-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2023-01-01 → 2023-03-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2023-01-01 → 2023-03-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2023-01-01 → 2023-03-31

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Lead
0.0027 mg/L 18%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
14/14 LCR 2025
Chloroform
68.8 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 70 µg/L
13/13 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
73.8 µg/L 92%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 75 µg/L
13/13 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
25 µg/L 42%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 40 µg/L
13/13 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromodichloromethane
7.675 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 8.5 µg/L
12/13 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
9 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 12 µg/L
11/13 SYR4 2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
20.8 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 28 µg/L
10/13 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
6.3 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 6.5 µg/L
2/13 SYR4 2012–2019
4 contaminants tested, none detected
BromoformDibromoacetic AcidMonobromoacetic AcidMonochloroacetic Acid

Utility contact

Contact
ROSENDALE TOWN SUPERVISOR

Frequently asked questions about High Falls Water District

Is High Falls Water District tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 8 contaminants in High Falls Water District's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in High Falls Water District's water?

EPA monitoring detected Lead, Chloroform, TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Bromodichloromethane, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does High Falls Water District serve?

High Falls Water District reports serving 426 people in New York, per its EPA record.

Has High Falls Water District had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 15 violations on file for High Falls Water District, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.