Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2015-07-01 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2015-07-01 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2005-01-01 → 2007-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2005-01-01 → 2007-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2005-01-01 → 2007-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2005-01-01 → 2007-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2005-01-01 → 2007-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2005-01-01 → 2007-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2005-01-01 → 2007-12-31 |
| MR | Monitoring | Resolved | 2005-01-01 → 2007-12-31 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nitrate | 1180 µg/L 12% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 16/16 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 0.00070 mg/L 4.7% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 14/14 | LCR | 2025 |
| Barium | 238.85 µg/L 12% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 240 µg/L | 2/2 | SYR4 | 2013–2015 |
| Bromodichloromethane | 4.4135 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.43 µg/L | 2/2 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Chloroform | 4.9715 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5 µg/L | 2/2 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 1.96 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 2 µg/L | 2/2 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 3.194 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.22 µg/L | 2/2 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 4.19 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 4.2 µg/L | 2/2 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| TTHM | 12.6075 µg/L 16% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 12.65 µg/L | 2/2 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 7.395 µg/L 12% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 7.4 µg/L | 2/2 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 1.875 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 1.9 µg/L | 2/2 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Bromoform | 0.5700 µg/L No EPA limit set | 1/2 | SYR4 | 2014–2017 |
| Combined Radium (-226 And -228) | 1.2 pCi/L 24% of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L | 1/1 | SYR4 | 2015 |
| Combined Uranium | 1.788 µg/L 6% of the EPA limit 30 µg/L | 1/1 | SYR4 | 2015 |
| Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U | 1.2 pCi/L 8% of the EPA limit 15 pCi/L | 1/1 | SYR4 | 2015 |
32 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about White Sulphur Springs Wd
Is White Sulphur Springs Wd tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 15 contaminants in White Sulphur Springs Wd's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in White Sulphur Springs Wd's water?
EPA monitoring detected Nitrate, Lead, Barium, Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does White Sulphur Springs Wd serve?
White Sulphur Springs Wd reports serving 300 people in New York, per its EPA record.
Has White Sulphur Springs Wd had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 44 violations on file for White Sulphur Springs Wd, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.