← New York

Tap water quality report

Woods at Kings Pond Condo W.S.

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 72 contaminants and detected 15. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

72
contaminants tested
15
detected
96
people served
0
health-based violations
Water source
Ground water
Ownership
Private
Counties served
Putnam

Compliance record

No violations on file. The EPA has no formal drinking-water violations recorded for this supplier.

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the single worst sample on record — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Nitrate
3160 µg/L 32%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
14/14 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0065 mg/L 43%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
7/7 LCR 2024
Dibromochloromethane
2.3 µg/L
No EPA limit set
6/6 SYR4 2012–2017
Bromoform
1.4 µg/L
No EPA limit set
5/6 SYR4 2012–2017
Chloroform
1.51 µg/L
No EPA limit set
5/6 SYR4 2012–2017
Bromodichloromethane
0.8800 µg/L
No EPA limit set
4/6 SYR4 2012–2017
TTHM
5.6 µg/L 7%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
3/3 SYR4 2012–2017
Barium
138 µg/L 6.9%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
2/2 SYR4 2013–2016
Monochloroacetic Acid
2.48 µg/L
No EPA limit set
2/4 SYR4 2012–2017
Nitrate-Nitrite
1560 µg/L 16%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
2/2 SYR4 2015–2016
Chromium
4.3 µg/L 4.3%
of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
1/2 SYR4 2013–2016
Combined Radium (-226 And -228)
1.35 pCi/L 27%
of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L
1/1 SYR4 2014
Gross Alpha, Excl. Radon And U
1.63 pCi/L 11%
of the EPA limit 15 pCi/L
1/1 SYR4 2014
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
5.07 µg/L 8.5%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
1/3 SYR4 2012–2017
Trichloroacetic Acid
2.59 µg/L
No EPA limit set
1/4 SYR4 2012–2017
57 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane2,4,5-TP2,4-DAntimony, TotalArsenicAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBeryllium, TotalChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneDichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDibromoacetic AcidDichloroacetic AcidDinosebEndrinEthylbenzeneFluorideHexachlorobenzeneHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorMonobromoacetic AcidNitriteOxamylPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTotal Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB)ToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl Chloridecis-1,2-DichloroethyleneO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
BRUSSELLS, STEPHEN

Frequently asked questions about Woods at Kings Pond Condo W.S.

Is Woods at Kings Pond Condo W.S. tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 15 contaminants in Woods at Kings Pond Condo W.S.'s water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Woods at Kings Pond Condo W.S.'s water?

EPA monitoring detected Nitrate, Lead, Dibromochloromethane, Bromoform, Chloroform, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Woods at Kings Pond Condo W.S. serve?

Woods at Kings Pond Condo W.S. reports serving 96 people in New York, per its EPA record.

Has Woods at Kings Pond Condo W.S. had any water quality violations?

The EPA has no formal drinking-water violations on file for Woods at Kings Pond Condo W.S..

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.