← New York

Tap water quality report

Clay Wds

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 42 contaminants and detected 12. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

42
contaminants tested
12
detected
16,000
people served
7
health-based violations
Water source
SWP
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Onondaga

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

7
health-based violations
35
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 2010-11-01 → 2010-11-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2010-11-01 → 2010-11-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2010-11-01 → 2010-11-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2004-08-01 → 2004-08-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2004-08-01 → 2004-08-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2004-08-01 → 2004-08-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2004-08-01 → 2004-08-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2022-10-01 → 2022-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2022-10-01 → 2022-12-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2022-10-01 → 2022-12-31

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the single worst sample on record — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Bromodichloromethane
23 µg/L
No EPA limit set
112/112 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
46 µg/L
No EPA limit set
112/112 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
80 µg/L 100%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
112/112 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
11 µg/L
No EPA limit set
111/111 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
35 µg/L 58%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
106/112 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
17 µg/L
No EPA limit set
105/112 SYR4 2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
20 µg/L
No EPA limit set
97/112 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromoform
2.7 µg/L
No EPA limit set
60/112 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
2.2 µg/L
No EPA limit set
24/112 SYR4 2012–2019
Monochloroacetic Acid
9.3 µg/L
No EPA limit set
24/112 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0040 mg/L 27%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
11/11 LCR 2025
Monobromoacetic Acid
1 µg/L
No EPA limit set
1/112 SYR4 2012–2019
30 contaminants tested, none detected
11Cl-PF3OUdS4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaHfpo-DaNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaPfbaPFBSPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfhxaPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPFOSPfpeaPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaLithium

Utility contact

Contact
CLAY TOWN SUPERVISOR & TOWN BOARD
Phone
315-652-3800

Frequently asked questions about Clay Wds

Is Clay Wds tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 12 contaminants in Clay Wds's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Clay Wds's water?

EPA monitoring detected Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, TTHM, Dibromochloromethane, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Clay Wds serve?

Clay Wds reports serving 16,000 people in New York, per its EPA record.

Has Clay Wds had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 35 violations on file for Clay Wds, of which 7 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.