Tap WaterIndex

← New York

Tap water quality report

Mohawk Correctional Facility

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 12 contaminants and detected 8. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

12
contaminants tested
8
detected
1,925
people served
21
health-based violations
New York rankingsLead in New YorkPFAS in New York
Water source
SWP
Ownership
State government
Counties served
Oneida

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

21
health-based violations
55
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 2015-04-01 → 2015-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2015-04-01 → 2015-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2015-04-01 → 2015-06-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2015-01-01 → 2015-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2015-01-01 → 2015-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2015-01-01 → 2015-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2014-10-01 → 2014-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2014-10-01 → 2014-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2014-10-01 → 2014-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2013-07-01 → 2013-09-30

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the single worst sample on record — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Bromodichloromethane
5.1 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 32/32 SYR4 2012–2019
Chloroform
105 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 32/32 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
33 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 32/32 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
109 µg/L 136%
of the EPA limit, in the worst sample — 80 µg/L
 32/32 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
90 µg/L 150%
of the EPA limit, in the worst sample — 60 µg/L
 32/32 SYR4 2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
60 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 31/32 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0040 mg/L 27%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
 20/20 LCR 2024
Monochloroacetic Acid
1.6 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 3/32 SYR4 2012–2019
4 contaminants tested, none detected
BromoformDibromoacetic AcidDibromochloromethaneMonobromoacetic Acid

Utility contact

Contact
HUGGLER, HAROLD
Phone
315-339-5232
Email
harold.huggler@doccs.ny.gov

Frequently asked questions about Mohawk Correctional Facility

Is Mohawk Correctional Facility tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 8 contaminants in Mohawk Correctional Facility's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Mohawk Correctional Facility's water?

EPA monitoring detected Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dichloroacetic Acid, TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Mohawk Correctional Facility serve?

Mohawk Correctional Facility reports serving 1,925 people in New York, per its EPA record.

Has Mohawk Correctional Facility had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 55 violations on file for Mohawk Correctional Facility, of which 21 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.