← New York

Tap water quality report

Florida (T) Water District

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 12 contaminants and detected 9. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

12
contaminants tested
9
detected
432
people served
122
health-based violations
Water source
SWP
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Montgomery

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

122
health-based violations
127
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MCL Health-based Resolved 2022-01-01 → 2022-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2022-01-01 → 2022-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2022-01-01 → 2022-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2022-01-01 → 2022-03-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2021-10-01 → 2021-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2021-10-01 → 2021-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2021-10-01 → 2021-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2021-10-01 → 2021-12-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2021-07-01 → 2021-09-30
MCL Health-based Resolved 2021-07-01 → 2021-09-30

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the single worst sample on record — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
TTHM
98.3 µg/L 123%
of the EPA limit, in the worst sample — 80 µg/L
32/32 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
54.5 µg/L 91%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
30/32 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromodichloromethane
2.8 µg/L
No EPA limit set
8/8 SYR4 2012–2013
Chloroform
96.4 µg/L
No EPA limit set
8/8 SYR4 2012–2013
Dichloroacetic Acid
23 µg/L
No EPA limit set
7/8 SYR4 2012–2013
Trichloroacetic Acid
18.8 µg/L
No EPA limit set
7/8 SYR4 2012–2013
Monochloroacetic Acid
1.8 µg/L
No EPA limit set
5/8 SYR4 2012–2013
Dibromochloromethane
1.8 µg/L
No EPA limit set
1/8 SYR4 2012–2013
Lead
0.0120 mg/L 80%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
1/1 LCR 2007
3 contaminants tested, none detected
BromoformDibromoacetic AcidMonobromoacetic Acid

Utility contact

Contact
FLORIDA TOWN SUPERVISOR
Phone
518-843-1277
Email
emead@co.montgomery.ny.us

Frequently asked questions about Florida (T) Water District

Is Florida (T) Water District tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 9 contaminants in Florida (T) Water District's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Florida (T) Water District's water?

EPA monitoring detected TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dichloroacetic Acid, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Florida (T) Water District serve?

Florida (T) Water District reports serving 432 people in New York, per its EPA record.

Has Florida (T) Water District had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 127 violations on file for Florida (T) Water District, of which 122 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.