Tap WaterIndex

← New York

Tap water quality report

Alabama Water District no.1

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 12 contaminants and detected 12. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

12
contaminants tested
12
detected
200
people served
0
health-based violations
New York rankingsLead in New YorkPFAS in New York
Water source
SWP
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Genesee

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

0
health-based violations
17
violations on file
0
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
MR Monitoring Resolved 2017-01-01
MR Monitoring Resolved 2017-01-01
MR Monitoring Resolved 2017-01-01
MR Monitoring Resolved 2016-01-01 → 2016-03-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2016-01-01 → 2016-03-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2016-01-01 → 2016-03-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2016-01-01 → 2016-03-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2016-01-01 → 2016-03-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2016-01-01 → 2016-03-31
MR Monitoring Resolved 2016-01-01 → 2016-03-31

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the single worst sample on record — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
53.5 µg/L 89%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
 40/40 SYR4 2013–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
35.2 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 40/40 SYR4 2013–2019
Bromodichloromethane
20.9 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 39/40 SYR4 2013–2019
Chloroform
83.8 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 39/40 SYR4 2013–2019
Dibromochloromethane
7.5 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 39/40 SYR4 2013–2019
TTHM
94 µg/L 118%
of the EPA limit, in the worst sample — 80 µg/L
 39/40 SYR4 2013–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
29.1 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 37/40 SYR4 2013–2019
Monochloroacetic Acid
4.73 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 22/40 SYR4 2013–2019
Dibromoacetic Acid
1.7 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 21/40 SYR4 2013–2019
Monobromoacetic Acid
1.71 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 14/40 SYR4 2013–2019
Lead
0.00075 mg/L 5%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
 13/13 LCR 2023
Bromoform
0.7800 µg/L
No EPA limit set
 8/40 SYR4 2013–2019

Utility contact

Contact
MANGINO, DANIEL
Phone
585-948-5479

Frequently asked questions about Alabama Water District no.1

Is Alabama Water District no.1 tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 12 contaminants in Alabama Water District no.1's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Alabama Water District no.1's water?

EPA monitoring detected Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Trichloroacetic Acid, Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, Dibromochloromethane, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Alabama Water District no.1 serve?

Alabama Water District no.1 reports serving 200 people in New York, per its EPA record.

Has Alabama Water District no.1 had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 17 violations on file for Alabama Water District no.1, of which 0 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.