← New York

Tap water quality report

Ticonderoga Wd

EPA monitoring tested this supplier for 104 contaminants and detected 19. A detection doesn't automatically mean the water is unsafe — the level and EPA source for each is below.

104
contaminants tested
19
detected
3,700
people served
12
health-based violations
Water source
Surface water
Ownership
Local government
Counties served
Essex

Compliance record

Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.

12
health-based violations
46
violations on file
5
still open
ViolationTypeStatusPeriod
TT Health-based Addressed 2011-08-08
TT Health-based Addressed 2011-08-08
TT Health-based Addressed 2011-08-08
TT Health-based Addressed 2011-08-08
TT Health-based Addressed 2011-08-08
MCL Health-based Resolved 2005-10-01 → 2005-10-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2005-10-01 → 2005-10-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2005-10-01 → 2005-10-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2005-05-01 → 2005-05-31
MCL Health-based Resolved 2005-05-01 → 2005-05-31

PFAS detected

PFAS are industrial “forever chemicals”. These are the EPA's latest nationwide test results (2023–2025).
ContaminantMaxDetection ratePeriod
Pfba 0.0055 µg/L 1/10 2023

Other contaminants detected

Each bar shows the measured level as a share of the EPA limit: green is well under, amber is close to it, red is over. For lead and copper the limit applies to exactly the 90th-percentile figure shown, so red there means a real exceedance. For everything else the limit applies to a running annual average while the figure is the 95th percentile of this system's samples — over 100% is worth reading, but is not by itself a violation. Where a single sample came in higher than that percentile, it is noted under the bar. Formal violations are listed separately.
ContaminantLevel vs EPA limitDetection rateSourcePeriod
Chloroform
53.32 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 66 µg/L
33/34 SYR4 2012–2019
Dichloroacetic Acid
23 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 27 µg/L
33/34 SYR4 2012–2019
TTHM
55.46 µg/L 69%
of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 68 µg/L
33/34 SYR4 2012–2019
Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5)
57.4 µg/L 96%
of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 79 µg/L
33/34 SYR4 2012–2019
Bromodichloromethane
5.3 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 5.8 µg/L
31/34 SYR4 2012–2019
Trichloroacetic Acid
36.6 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 51 µg/L
31/34 SYR4 2012–2019
Monochloroacetic Acid
2.44 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3 µg/L
15/34 SYR4 2012–2019
Lead
0.0021 mg/L 14%
of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L
12/12 LCR 2023
Barium
6.545 µg/L 0.3%
of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 7.4 µg/L
10/17 SYR4 2012–2019
Monobromoacetic Acid
0.8480 µg/L
No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 0.8900 µg/L
4/34 SYR4 2012–2019
Combined Uranium
0.5887 µg/L 2%
of the EPA limit 30 µg/L
worst single sample: 0.5950 µg/L
2/3 SYR4 2017–2019
Fluoride
109.5 µg/L 2.7%
of the EPA limit 4000 µg/L
worst single sample: 110 µg/L
2/17 SYR4 2012–2019
Nitrate
230 µg/L 2.3%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
2/34 SYR4 2012–2019
Arsenic
0.6000 µg/L 6%
of the EPA limit 10 µg/L
1/17 SYR4 2012–2019
Beryllium, Total
8.9 µg/L 223%
of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 4 µg/L
1/17 SYR4 2012–2019
Dibromochloromethane
0.5700 µg/L
No EPA limit set
1/34 SYR4 2012–2019
Nitrate-Nitrite
240 µg/L 2.4%
of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
1/1 SYR4 2019
Nitrite
10 µg/L 1%
of the EPA limit 1000 µg/L
1/1 SYR4 2019
85 contaminants tested, none detected
1,1,1-Trichloroethane1,1,2-Trichloroethane1,1-Dichloroethylene1,2,4-Trichlorobenzene1,2-Dichloroethane1,2-Dichloropropane11Cl-PF3OUdS2,4,5-TP2,4-D4:2 Fts6:2 Fts8:2 Fts9Cl-PF3ONSAdonaAntimony, TotalAtrazineBhc-GammaBenzeneBenzo(A)PyreneBromoformChlorobenzeneCyanideCadmiumCarbofuranCarbon TetrachlorideChlordaneChromiumCombined Radium (-226 And -228)DichloromethaneDalaponDi(2-ethylhexyl) AdipateDi(2-ethylhexyl) PhthalateDibromoacetic AcidDinosebEthylene DibromideEndrinEthylbenzeneGross Alpha, Excl. Radon And UHexachlorobenzeneHfpo-DaHeptachlorHeptachlor EpoxideHexachlorocyclopentadieneLassoMercuryMethoxychlorNetfosaaNfdhaNmefosaaOxamylPFBSPfdaPfdoaPfeesaPfhpaPfhpsPfhxaPFHXSPfmbaPfmpaPFNAPFOAPFOSPfpeaPfpesPftaPftrdaPfunaPentachlorophenolPicloramSeleniumSimazineStyreneTetrachloroethyleneThallium, TotalTolueneTotal Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB)ToxapheneTrichloroethyleneVinyl Chloridecis-1,2-DichloroethyleneLithiumO-DichlorobenzeneP-Dichlorobenzenetrans-1,2-Dichloroethylene

Utility contact

Contact
TICONDEROGA SUPERVISOR AND TOWN BOARD
Phone
518-585-6265
Email
supervisor@townofticonderoga.org

Frequently asked questions about Ticonderoga Wd

Is Ticonderoga Wd tap water safe to drink?

EPA monitoring detected 19 contaminants in Ticonderoga Wd's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.

What contaminants were detected in Ticonderoga Wd's water?

EPA monitoring detected Chloroform, Dichloroacetic Acid, TTHM, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), Bromodichloromethane, and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.

How many people does Ticonderoga Wd serve?

Ticonderoga Wd reports serving 3,700 people in New York, per its EPA record.

Has Ticonderoga Wd had any water quality violations?

The EPA has 46 violations on file for Ticonderoga Wd, of which 12 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 5 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.

Where does this data come from?

Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.