Compliance record
Formal violations the EPA has on file for this supplier. A health-based violation means a contaminant limit or a required treatment was breached; the rest are monitoring or reporting failures — still violations, but not a measured health risk.
| Violation | Type | Status | Period |
|---|---|---|---|
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2025-04-01 → 2025-04-30 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 2025-04-01 → 2025-04-30 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 1995-07-01 → 1995-07-31 |
| MCL | Health-based | Resolved | 1995-07-01 → 1995-07-31 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 1993-07-01 → 1993-07-31 |
| TT | Health-based | Resolved | 1992-01-01 → 1995-10-30 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2016-07-01 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2016-07-01 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2015-09-01 |
| Other | Monitoring | Resolved | 2015-09-01 |
Other contaminants detected
| Contaminant | Level vs EPA limit | Detection rate | Source | Period |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bromodichloromethane | 20 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 26.2 µg/L | 124/124 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chloroform | 26 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 31.8 µg/L | 124/124 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| TTHM | 60.045 µg/L 75% of the EPA limit 80 µg/L
worst single sample: 69.3 µg/L | 124/124 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromochloromethane | 15.98 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 20 µg/L | 123/123 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5) | 29.05 µg/L 48% of the EPA limit 60 µg/L
worst single sample: 37 µg/L | 120/120 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dichloroacetic Acid | 14.1 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 23 µg/L | 119/120 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Trichloroacetic Acid | 13.37 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 20 µg/L | 119/120 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Dibromoacetic Acid | 4.9 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 10.3 µg/L | 74/120 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Bromoform | 3.134 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.5 µg/L | 72/124 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Monochloroacetic Acid | 5.854 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 7.27 µg/L | 23/120 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Nitrate | 290 µg/L 2.9% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L | 16/16 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Lead | 0.0018 mg/L 12% of the EPA limit 0.0150 mg/L | 9/9 | LCR | 2023 |
| Monobromoacetic Acid | 2.692 µg/L No EPA limit set
worst single sample: 3.6 µg/L | 9/120 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Barium | 43.86 µg/L 2.2% of the EPA limit 2000 µg/L
worst single sample: 46.8 µg/L | 8/8 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Tetrachloroethylene | 8.355 µg/L 167% of the EPA limit, at the 95th percentile of samples — 5 µg/L
worst single sample: 9.2 µg/L | 6/50 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Chromium | 0.2880 µg/L 0.3% of the EPA limit 100 µg/L
worst single sample: 0.2900 µg/L | 2/10 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Nitrate-Nitrite | 243.15 µg/L 2.4% of the EPA limit 10000 µg/L
worst single sample: 250 µg/L | 2/2 | SYR4 | 2013–2019 |
| Selenium | 2.6225 µg/L 5.2% of the EPA limit 50 µg/L
worst single sample: 2.65 µg/L | 2/8 | SYR4 | 2012–2019 |
| Combined Radium (-226 And -228) | 0.2730 pCi/L 5.5% of the EPA limit 5 pCi/L | 1/1 | SYR4 | 2018 |
| Combined Uranium | 0.6220 µg/L 2.1% of the EPA limit 30 µg/L | 1/1 | SYR4 | 2018 |
85 contaminants tested, none detected
Utility contact
Frequently asked questions about Beacon City
Is Beacon City tap water safe to drink?
EPA monitoring detected 20 contaminants in Beacon City's water. A detection isn't the same as a violation — most levels are within federal limits. See each level and source above, and the utility's annual Consumer Confidence Report for its official compliance status.
What contaminants were detected in Beacon City's water?
EPA monitoring detected Bromodichloromethane, Chloroform, TTHM, Dibromochloromethane, Total Haloacetic Acids (HAA5), and others. The full list with the level and data source for each is above.
How many people does Beacon City serve?
Beacon City reports serving 14,370 people in New York, per its EPA record.
Has Beacon City had any water quality violations?
The EPA has 16 violations on file for Beacon City, of which 6 are health-based (a contaminant limit or required treatment was breached) and 0 remain open. The rest are monitoring or reporting failures.
Where does this data come from?
Every figure is official EPA drinking-water monitoring — the Lead & Copper Rule, the UCMR-5 nationwide testing program, and the EPA Six-Year Review — not our own testing. Each number is labelled with its source and period.